Soos Catherine, Parmley E Jane, McAloney Keith, Pollard Bruce, Jenkins Emily, Kibenge Fred, Leighton Frederick A
Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada, 115 Perimeter Rd, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0X4, Canada.
J Wildl Dis. 2012 Apr;48(2):444-8. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-48.2.444.
In 2007, we assessed whether trapping method influenced apparent prevalence of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses (AIV) in wild ducks sampled during Canada's Inter-agency Wild Bird Influenza Survey. Combined cloacal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from 514 ducks captured by bait trapping (356) and netting from airboats (158), and tested by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for influenza type A viruses. When controlling for species and capture site, ducks caught in bait traps were 2.6 times more likely to test positive for AIV compared with those netted from airboats (95% CI=1.2-6.0). If bait trapping increases AIV transmission among artificially aggregated ducks, this could have important implications for interpretation of disease surveillance results and waterfowl management programs.
2007年,我们评估了诱捕方法是否会影响在加拿大跨部门野生鸟类流感调查期间采集的野鸭样本中低致病性禽流感病毒(AIV)的表观流行率。从通过诱饵诱捕(356只)和从汽艇上用网捕获(158只)的514只鸭子中采集泄殖腔和口咽联合拭子,并通过实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测甲型流感病毒。在控制物种和捕获地点后,与从汽艇上用网捕获的鸭子相比,诱饵诱捕的鸭子检测出AIV呈阳性的可能性高2.6倍(95%置信区间=1.2-6.0)。如果诱饵诱捕增加了人工聚集鸭子之间的AIV传播,这可能会对疾病监测结果的解释和水禽管理计划产生重要影响。