Pannwitz G, Wolf C, Harder T
District Food and Veterinary Office, Ostvorpommern, Bluthsluster Str. 5b, D-17389, Anklam, Germany.
J Wildl Dis. 2009 Apr;45(2):512-8. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-45.2.512.
A total of 1991 environmental samples of fresh avian feces and urine from several aquatic bird species in a coastal area of Northeast Germany were examined for the presence of avian influenza viruses (AIV). By real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, specific for an M gene of influenza A viruses, none of 659 duck samples and only 11 (0.9%) of 1,268 geese and swan samples tested positive. Two of these were identified as H5N2 viruses of low pathogenicity. Conventional cloacal and oropharyngeal swab samples (n=1,402) collected in an adjacent coastal region in Northeast Germany from comparable species of captured or hunted birds, yielded a similar detection rate (3/901; 0.4%) for AIV-specific RNA in geese and swans, but a higher rate (4/309; 1%) for ducks. No virus isolates were obtained from either set of samples. Collection of environmental avian samples was simple and cost effective and also allowed us to regulate sample sizes over time. A species assignment of these samples was possible, provided that close presampling observation of birds at the sampling sites was secured. Environmental sampling to monitor AIV in wild bird populations may be a valid alternative to the more-invasive and capture-dependent methods based on cloacal sampling.
对德国东北部沿海地区几种水鸟的1991份新鲜禽粪便和尿液环境样本进行了禽流感病毒(AIV)检测。通过针对甲型流感病毒M基因的实时逆转录聚合酶链反应,659份鸭样本均未检测出阳性,1268份鹅和天鹅样本中只有11份(0.9%)检测呈阳性。其中两份被鉴定为低致病性H5N2病毒。在德国东北部相邻沿海地区,从捕获或猎杀的类似鸟类物种中采集的常规泄殖腔和口咽拭子样本(n = 1402),鹅和天鹅的AIV特异性RNA检测率相似(3/901;0.4%),但鸭的检测率更高(4/309;1%)。两组样本均未获得病毒分离株。采集环境鸟类样本简单且经济高效,还使我们能够随时间调整样本量。只要确保在采样地点对鸟类进行采样前的密切观察,就可以对这些样本进行物种分类。对野生鸟类种群进行环境采样以监测AIV,可能是基于泄殖腔采样的侵入性更强且依赖捕获的方法的有效替代方案。