Suppr超能文献

联合氟化物疗法。在苏格兰因弗内斯进行的一项为期6年的基于学校的双盲预防牙科研究。

Combined fluoride therapies. A 6-year double-blind school-based preventive dentistry study in Inverness, Scotland.

作者信息

Stephen K W, Kay E J, Tullis J I

机构信息

University of Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1990 Oct;18(5):244-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1990.tb00068.x.

Abstract

A 6-yr double-blind study was undertaken to compare the caries inhibiting-effectiveness of (a) 1 mgF- tablets (daily at school) plus fortnightly rinsing at school with 1000 ppmF-; (b) 1 mgF- tablets plus placebo rinsing; and (c) placebo tablets plus 1000 ppmF- rinsing. Participants were aged 4.5-5 yr at outset of the trial. At baseline, and annually thereafter, clinical caries and bitewing X-ray examinations were undertaken, hence ethical approval for a negative control was not feasible. Fissure sealant presence was also recorded. Initially, 192 children from predominantly low socio-economic backgrounds were enrolled, and baseline analyses showed no significant differences between groups with respect to primary caries prevalence. After 6 yr, 112 children remained, by which time no significant differences were noted between DMFT and DMFS values for those in the active tablet/active rinse group, as compared to those in the placebo tablet/active rinse group. However, in relation to both indices, in permanent first molars, the effectiveness of the active tablet/placebo rinse regime appeared to be significantly poorer than the placebo tablet/active rinse programme. For the active tablet/active rinse group, the DMFT difference was significantly less than the active tablet/placebo rinse group (37.9%), although for the DMFS difference, significance was not achieved. Similar trends were noted when DMFT and DMFS values for all permanent teeth were considered. The occlusal caries prevalence in permanent first molars followed the DMFT pattern, but differences between combined tablet/rinsing children and tablet-only children could be ascribed solely to the effectiveness of sealant presence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

开展了一项为期6年的双盲研究,以比较以下三种情况的防龋效果:(a) 1毫克氟片(每天在学校服用)加每两周在学校用1000 ppm氟溶液漱口;(b) 1毫克氟片加用安慰剂漱口;(c) 安慰剂片加1000 ppm氟溶液漱口。试验开始时参与者年龄为4.5至5岁。在基线时以及此后每年进行临床龋齿和咬合翼片X线检查,因此对阴性对照进行伦理批准不可行。还记录了窝沟封闭剂的使用情况。最初,招募了192名主要来自社会经济背景较低的儿童,基线分析显示各组在乳牙龋齿患病率方面无显著差异。6年后,仍有112名儿童,此时,活性片/活性漱口组的DMFT和DMFS值与安慰剂片/活性漱口组相比无显著差异。然而,就这两个指数而言,在恒牙第一磨牙中,活性片/安慰剂漱口方案的效果似乎明显不如安慰剂片/活性漱口方案。对于活性片/活性漱口组,DMFT差异明显小于活性片/安慰剂漱口组(37.9%),尽管对于DMFS差异未达到显著水平。考虑所有恒牙的DMFT和DMFS值时也发现了类似趋势。恒牙第一磨牙的咬合面龋齿患病率遵循DMFT模式,但联合使用片剂/漱口的儿童与仅使用片剂的儿童之间的差异可能完全归因于窝沟封闭剂的效果。(摘要截短于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验