• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学校供餐计划在有学校供餐相关法律的州是否更为常见?

Are farm-to-school programs more common in states with farm-to-school-related laws?

机构信息

Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA.

出版信息

J Sch Health. 2012 May;82(5):210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2012.00689.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2012.00689.x
PMID:22494091
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Farm-to-School programs (FTSPs) connect schools with locally grown food. This article examines whether FTSPs are more common in public elementary schools (ESs) in states with a formal, FTSP law or with a related, locally grown procurement law.

METHODS

A pooled, cross-sectional analysis linked nationally representative samples of 1872 public ESs (across 47 states) for the 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009 school years with state laws effective as of the beginning of September of each year that were collected and analyzed for all states. Multivariate logistic regression models examined the impact of state law on school FTSP participation, controlling for year and school-level race/ethnicity, region, locale, free-reduced lunch participation, and school size.

RESULTS

The percentage of schools located in a state with a FTSP-specific law increased from 7.3% to 20.4% over the 3-year period, while the percentage of schools located in a state with a locally grown procurement law was approximately 30% across all years. The percentage of schools with FTSPs has more than tripled over the last 3 years (from 4.9% to 17.7%). After adjusting for all covariates except year, FTSPs were significantly more likely in states with a FTSP-specific law (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.28-4.67); once adjusting for year, the results were marginally significant (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = .91-3.25). School-level FTSPs were not related to state locally grown procurement laws.

CONCLUSION

Although the percentage of schools with FTSPs is relatively small, these programs are becoming more common, particularly in states with FTSP-specific laws.

摘要

背景

农场到学校计划(FTSP)将学校与当地种植的食物联系起来。本文研究了 FTSP 在有正式的 FTSP 法律或相关的本地采购法律的州的公立小学(ES)中是否更为常见。

方法

一项汇总的、跨截面分析将具有代表性的全国性样本中的 1872 所公立 ES(分布在 47 个州)与截至每年 9 月初有效的州法律联系起来,这些法律是针对所有州收集和分析的。多变量逻辑回归模型检验了州法律对学校 FTSP 参与的影响,控制了年度和学校层面的种族/族裔、地区、位置、免费-减少午餐参与和学校规模。

结果

在三年期间,位于有 FTSP 特定法律的州的学校比例从 7.3%增加到 20.4%,而位于有本地采购法律的州的学校比例约为 30%。在过去的 3 年中,有 FTSP 的学校比例增加了两倍多(从 4.9%增加到 17.7%)。在除年份之外的所有协变量调整后,FTSP 在有 FTSP 特定法律的州更有可能(OR = 2.45,95% CI = 1.28-4.67);一旦调整了年份,结果就变得略微显著(OR = 1.72,95% CI =.91-3.25)。学校层面的 FTSP 与州的本地采购法律无关。

结论

尽管有 FTSP 的学校比例相对较小,但这些计划越来越普遍,特别是在有 FTSP 特定法律的州。

相似文献

1
Are farm-to-school programs more common in states with farm-to-school-related laws?学校供餐计划在有学校供餐相关法律的州是否更为常见?
J Sch Health. 2012 May;82(5):210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2012.00689.x.
2
State farm-to-school laws influence the availability of fruits and vegetables in school lunches at US public elementary schools.州立农场到学校的法律影响着美国公立小学学校午餐中水果和蔬菜的供应情况。
J Sch Health. 2014 May;84(5):310-6. doi: 10.1111/josh.12151.
3
The relationship among state laws, district policies, and elementary school-based measurement of children's body mass index.州法律、地区政策与小学儿童身体质量指数测量之间的关系。
J Sch Health. 2012 May;82(5):239-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2012.00693.x.
4
The impact of state safe routes to school-related laws on active travel to school policies and practices in U.S. elementary schools.州安全上学相关法律对美国小学积极上学政策和实践的影响。
Health Place. 2012 Jan;18(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.006.
5
State and district policy influences on district-wide elementary and middle school physical education practices.州和地区政策对全区小学和中学体育教育实践的影响。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 May-Jun;19(3 Suppl 1):S41-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31828a8bce.
6
Facilitating Fresh: State Laws Supporting School Gardens Are Associated With Use of Garden-Grown Produce in School Nutrition Services Programs.促进新鲜:支持校园花园的州法律与学校营养服务项目中使用花园种植的农产品相关。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Jun;49(6):481-489.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 15.
7
Elementary school participation in the United States Department of Agriculture's Team Nutrition program is associated with more healthful school lunches.美国农业部的“团队营养计划”(Team Nutrition program)让小学生参与其中,与更健康的学校午餐有关。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Nov-Dec;45(6):733-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
Classroom parties in US elementary schools: the potential for policies to reduce student exposure to sugary foods and beverages.美国小学的课堂派对:通过政策减少学生摄入含糖食品和饮料的潜在机会。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Nov-Dec;45(6):611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.04.261. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
9
School meals: types of foods offered to and consumed by children at lunch and breakfast.学校膳食:儿童在午餐和早餐时所提供和食用的食物类型。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Feb;109(2 Suppl):S67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.062.
10
Participation in the national school lunch program: importance of school-level and neighborhood contextual factors.参与国家学校午餐计划:学校层面和社区背景因素的重要性。
J Sch Health. 2009 Oct;79(10):485-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00438.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Farm to school programs in low-income, high minority K-12 schools in New Jersey before and after implementation of the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act.新泽西州低收入、少数族裔比例高的K-12学校在实施《健康无饥饿儿童法案》前后的从农场到学校项目。
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2023;18(5):651-660. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2023.2184666. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
2
Aligning Organizational Priorities and System Policies to Support Implementation Scale-Up of a Tailored Classroom-Based Physical Activity Intervention in Low-Resource Schools.调整组织优先级和系统政策,以支持在资源匮乏的学校中实施基于课堂的定制体育活动干预措施的扩大规模。
J Sch Health. 2023 Jun;93(6):464-474. doi: 10.1111/josh.13321. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
3
School Garden Prevalence Before and After the Implementation of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act.
学校花园在《健康无饥饿儿童法案》实施前后的普及情况。
J Sch Health. 2022 Sep;92(9):907-915. doi: 10.1111/josh.13197. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
4
Government Policy for the Procurement of Food from Local Family Farming in Brazilian Public Institutions.巴西公共机构从当地家庭农场采购食品的政府政策。
Foods. 2021 Jul 10;10(7):1604. doi: 10.3390/foods10071604.
5
Facilitating Factors and Opportunities for Local Food Purchases in School Meals in Spain.促进西班牙学校餐中本地食品购买的因素和机会。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2009. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042009.
6
State Laws Are Associated with School Lunch Duration and Promotion Practices.州法律与学校午餐时长和推广实践有关。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Mar;118(3):455-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.08.116. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
7
Facilitating Fresh: State Laws Supporting School Gardens Are Associated With Use of Garden-Grown Produce in School Nutrition Services Programs.促进新鲜:支持校园花园的州法律与学校营养服务项目中使用花园种植的农产品相关。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Jun;49(6):481-489.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 15.
8
Obesity Prevention Policies in U.S. States and Localities: Lessons from the Field.美国各州及地方的肥胖预防政策:来自实地的经验教训。
Curr Obes Rep. 2013 Sep;2(3):200-210. doi: 10.1007/s13679-013-0063-x.