Suppr超能文献

需要机械通气的患者在急诊停留时间:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Emergency department length of stay for patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study.

机构信息

Lawrence S, Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, 155 College St, Rm 276, Toronto, ON, M5T IP8, Canada.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Apr 11;20:30. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recommendations for acceptable emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) vary internationally with ≤ 8 h generally considered acceptable. Protracted ED LOS may place critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation at increased risk of adverse events as most EDs are not resourced for longitudinal delivery of critical care. Our objective was to quantify the ED LOS for mechanically ventilated patients (invasive and/or non-invasive ventilation [NIV]) and to explore patient and system level predictors of prolonged ED LOS. Additionally, we aimed to describe delivery and monitoring of ventilation in the ED.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of ED LOS for all patients receiving mechanical ventilation at four metropolitan EDs in Toronto, Canada over two six-month periods in 2009 and 2010.

RESULTS

We identified 618 mechanically ventilated patients which represented 0.5% (95% CI 0.4%-0.5%) of all ED visits. Of these, 484 (78.3%) received invasive ventilation, 118 (19.1%) received NIV; 16 received both during the ED stay. Median Kaplan-Meier estimated duration of ED stay for all patients was 6.4 h (IQR 2.8-14.6). Patients with trauma diagnoses had a shorter median (IQR) LOS, 2.5 h (1.3-5.1), compared to ventilated patients with non-trauma diagnoses, 8.5 h (3.3-14.0) (p <0.001). Patients requiring NIV had a longer ED stay (16.6 h, 8.2-27.9) compared to those receiving invasive ventilation exclusively (4.6 h, 2.2-11.1) and patients receiving both (15.4 h, 6.4-32.6) (p <0.001). Longer ED LOS was associated with ED site and lower priority triage scores. Shorter ED LOS was associated with intubation at another ED prior to transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

While patients requiring mechanical ventilation represent a small proportion of overall ED visits these critically ill patients frequently experienced prolonged ED stay especially those treated with NIV, assigned lower priority triage scores at ED presentation, and non-trauma patients.

摘要

背景

国际上对急诊科(ED)可接受的住院时间(LOS)的建议有所不同,一般认为≤8 小时是可以接受的。ED 住院时间延长可能会使需要机械通气的重症患者面临更多不良事件的风险,因为大多数 ED 没有资源提供长期的重症监护。我们的目的是量化机械通气患者(有创和/或无创通气[NIV])的 ED LOS,并探讨患者和系统水平对延长 ED LOS 的预测因素。此外,我们旨在描述 ED 中通气的实施和监测。

方法

前瞻性观察研究 2009 年和 2010 年在加拿大多伦多四个大都市 ED 接受机械通气的所有患者的 ED LOS。

结果

我们确定了 618 名接受机械通气的患者,占所有 ED 就诊患者的 0.5%(95%CI 0.4%-0.5%)。其中,484 名(78.3%)接受有创通气,118 名(19.1%)接受 NIV;16 名在 ED 期间同时接受两种治疗。所有患者的中位 Kaplan-Meier 估计 ED 住院时间为 6.4 小时(IQR 2.8-14.6)。与有非创伤诊断的通气患者相比,创伤诊断患者的中位(IQR) LOS 更短,为 2.5 小时(1.3-5.1),而有创伤诊断患者的中位(IQR) LOS 为 8.5 小时(3.3-14.0)(p<0.001)。需要 NIV 的患者的 ED 住院时间较长(16.6 小时,8.2-27.9),而仅接受有创通气的患者为 4.6 小时(2.2-11.1),接受两者的患者为 15.4 小时(6.4-32.6)(p<0.001)。较长的 ED LOS 与 ED 地点和较低的优先级分诊评分相关。较短的 ED LOS 与在转院前在另一个 ED 进行插管有关。

结论

尽管需要机械通气的患者在总体 ED 就诊患者中所占比例较小,但这些重症患者经常经历较长的 ED 住院时间,尤其是那些接受 NIV 治疗、在 ED 就诊时分配较低优先级分诊评分和非创伤患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dce4/3466156/299a2bb5653d/1757-7241-20-30-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验