• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于大样本澳大利亚队列的横断面研究,探索了吸烟状况和社会互动之间的关系。

A cross-sectional exploration of smoking status and social interaction in a large population-based Australian cohort.

机构信息

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St., Woolloomooloo 2011, Australia.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.041. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.041
PMID:22495512
Abstract

We used cross-sectional data to investigate whether current, past and never smokers report different levels of social interaction and whether the level of social interaction varied according to the type of interaction being measured. Self-reported questionnaire data were obtained from 239,043 men and women aged 45 years or older living in Australia between February 2006 and February 2010. The study participation rate was 18%. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the percentage differences in the mean values of four social interaction outcomes according to smoking status after adjusting for age, place of residence, income, education, health insurance status, physical limitation, psychological distress and exposure to passive smoke: number of times 1) spent with friends/family, 2) spoken on the telephone, 3) attended social meetings in the past week, and 4) number of people outside of home that can be depended upon. 7.6% of males and 6.9% of females were current smokers, 43.6% of males and 28.6% of females were ex-smokers and 48.8% of males and 64.5% of females had never smoked. Compared to never smokers, current smokers reported significantly fewer social interactions in the past week and had fewer people outside the home that they could depend on. Men and women current smokers attended 24.0% (95% CI, 20.3, 27.5) and 31.1% (95% CI, 28.1, 34.1) fewer social group meetings on average than never smokers. Smokers exposed to passive smoke reported higher levels of social interaction than those not exposed. Past smokers reported levels of social interaction that were intermediate to those of current and never smokers and the more years they had abstained from smoking, the more social interaction they reported on average. Our data are in line with previous research showing that smokers are not only worse off economically, physically and mentally, but are also less likely to be socially connected.

摘要

我们使用横断面数据来研究当前吸烟者、曾经吸烟者和从不吸烟者报告的社会交往水平是否不同,以及社会交往水平是否因所测量的交往类型而异。2006 年 2 月至 2010 年 2 月期间,澳大利亚年龄在 45 岁及以上的 239043 名男性和女性提供了自我报告的问卷调查数据。研究参与率为 18%。调整年龄、居住地、收入、教育程度、医疗保险状况、身体限制、心理困扰和被动吸烟暴露等因素后,使用泊松回归模型估计四种社会交往结果的平均值在吸烟状况之间的百分比差异:1)与朋友/家人共度的次数;2)通过电话交谈的次数;3)过去一周参加社交聚会的次数;4)家中以外可以依靠的人数。7.6%的男性和 6.9%的女性为当前吸烟者,43.6%的男性和 28.6%的女性为曾经吸烟者,48.8%的男性和 64.5%的女性为从不吸烟者。与从不吸烟者相比,当前吸烟者过去一周的社会交往明显减少,家中可依靠的人也较少。男性和女性当前吸烟者参加社交团体会议的平均次数分别比从不吸烟者少 24.0%(95%CI,20.3,27.5)和 31.1%(95%CI,28.1,34.1)。接触被动吸烟的吸烟者比未接触者报告的社会交往水平更高。曾经吸烟者的社会交往水平处于当前吸烟者和从不吸烟者之间,且他们戒烟的年限越长,平均社会交往水平越高。我们的数据与先前的研究结果一致,即吸烟者不仅在经济、身体和精神方面状况更差,而且社会联系也更少。

相似文献

1
A cross-sectional exploration of smoking status and social interaction in a large population-based Australian cohort.一项基于大样本澳大利亚队列的横断面研究,探索了吸烟状况和社会互动之间的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.041. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
2
Hypertension and its identification among current, past and never smokers in an English population sample.英国人群样本中当前吸烟者、既往吸烟者和从不吸烟者的高血压及其识别情况。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Feb;17(1):63-70. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832f3b42.
3
Active cigarette smoking, secondhand smoke exposure at work and home, and self-rated health.主动吸烟、工作和家庭环境中的二手烟暴露以及自评健康状况。
Public Health. 2009 Oct;123(10):650-6. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
4
Church-related correlates of tobacco use among Lumbee Indians in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州拉姆比印第安人中与烟草使用相关的教会因素
Ethn Dis. 1998 Winter;8(1):73-80.
5
Smoking and oral health status.吸烟与口腔健康状况。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2007 Mar;73(2):155.
6
Depression and smoking amongst older general practice patients.老年全科医疗患者中的抑郁与吸烟情况
J Affect Disord. 2005 Jun;86(2-3):317-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.02.014.
7
Epidemiology of smoking among Kuwaiti adults: prevalence, characteristics, and attitudes.科威特成年人吸烟的流行病学:患病率、特征及态度
Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(11):1306-15.
8
Analysis of national data shows mixed evidence of hardening among Australian smokers.分析全国数据显示,澳大利亚烟民吸烟行为出现一些趋紧的混合迹象。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Oct;36(5):408-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00908.x.
9
Smokers with multiple behavioral risk factors: how are they different?具有多种行为风险因素的吸烟者:他们有何不同?
Prev Med. 2000 Oct;31(4):299-307. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0710.
10
[A cross-sectional study on self-reported health and intention of quitting smoking of smokers in Guangzhou factory workers].[广州市工厂工人吸烟者自我报告健康状况及戒烟意愿的横断面研究]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2008 Dec;26(12):733-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Perceptions and Behaviors Related to Vaping Nicotine: The Nicotine Addiction Perceptions Scale.评估与吸电子烟尼古丁相关的认知和行为:尼古丁成瘾认知量表。
Tob Use Insights. 2025 Apr 26;18:1179173X251336468. doi: 10.1177/1179173X251336468. eCollection 2025.
2
A review of the effects of nicotine on social functioning.尼古丁对社交功能影响的综述。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Oct;26(5):425-439. doi: 10.1037/pha0000208. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3
The long-term effects of occupational exposure to vinyl chloride monomer on microcirculation: a cross-sectional study 15 years after retirement.
职业性接触氯乙烯单体对微循环的长期影响:退休后 15 年的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):e002785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002785.
4
Do social interactions explain ethnic differences in psychological distress and the protective effect of local ethnic density? A cross-sectional study of 226 487 adults in Australia.社会交往能否解释心理困扰方面的种族差异,以及当地种族密度的保护作用?对澳大利亚 226487 名成年人进行的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 2;3(5):e002713. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002713.