• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

侧向加压或单根牙胶尖技术充填下颌磨牙近中根管的牙胶尖比例。

Percentage of gutta-percha in mesial canals of mandibular molars obturated by lateral compaction or single cone techniques.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Microsc Res Tech. 2012 Sep;75(9):1229-32. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22053. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1002/jemt.22053
PMID:22495975
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the percentage of gutta-percha (PGP) in mesial root canals of mandibular molars obturated with LC (Lateral Compaction) or SC (Single Cone) ProTaper Universal System techniques at different levels of the root. Mesial root canals of 20 human permanent molars with similar anatomical characteristics were instrumented using the ProTaper Universal rotary system technique until the F2 instrument, with 20 canals filled by SC ProTaper Universal technique and 20 canals by the LC technique. The mesial roots were sectioned transversely to 3, 5, and 7 mm from the root apex. Digital images of specimens were obtained at MIC-D digital microscope in increases of 30 to 35X. The gutta-percha area was measured using ImageTool software. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test (α = 0.05). The SC technique provided greater PGP than the LC technique in the apical third (3 mm) (P < 0.001). In the other thirds (5 and 7 mm) there was no statistical difference between the two techniques regarding the PGP (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between thirds of the root canal for both techniques (P > 0.05). It was concluded that SC technique provided greater PGP than the LC technique in the apical third of mesial root canals of mandibular molars. There was no difference between the two techniques regarding the PGP in the cervical and middle thirds.

摘要

本研究旨在比较使用 LC(侧向压实)或 SC(单根锥)ProTaper 通用系统技术在根尖不同水平对下颌磨牙近中根管进行塑化时的塑化剂(PGP)百分比。使用 ProTaper 通用旋转系统技术对 20 个人类恒磨牙具有相似解剖特征的近中根管进行根管预备,直到 F2 器械,其中 20 个根管用 SC ProTaper 通用技术填充,20 个根管用 LC 技术填充。近中根从根尖到 3、5 和 7mm 处横向切割。在 MIC-D 数字显微镜下以 30 到 35X 的倍数获得标本的数字图像。使用 ImageTool 软件测量塑化剂面积。使用双向方差分析和 Bonferroni 检验(α=0.05)对数据进行分析。SC 技术在根尖三分之一(3mm)处提供的 PGP 高于 LC 技术(P<0.001)。在其他三分之一(5 和 7mm)处,两种技术之间的 PGP 没有统计学差异(P>0.05)。两种技术的根管三分之一之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:SC 技术在下颌磨牙近中根管根尖三分之一处提供的 PGP 高于 LC 技术。两种技术在颈中和中三分之一处的 PGP 没有差异。

相似文献

1
Percentage of gutta-percha in mesial canals of mandibular molars obturated by lateral compaction or single cone techniques.侧向加压或单根牙胶尖技术充填下颌磨牙近中根管的牙胶尖比例。
Microsc Res Tech. 2012 Sep;75(9):1229-32. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22053. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
2
Effect of filling technique and root canal area on the percentage of gutta-percha in laterally compacted root fillings.充填技术和根管面积对侧向加压根管充填中牙胶所占百分比的影响。
Int Endod J. 2009 Aug;42(8):719-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01575.x. Epub 2009 May 8.
3
Clinical microscopic analysis of ProTaper retreatment system efficacy considering root canal thirds using three endodontic sealers.考虑根管三分位的三种根管封闭剂对 ProTaper 再治疗系统疗效的临床显微镜分析。
Microsc Res Tech. 2012 Sep;75(9):1233-6. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22054. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
4
An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals.对用于充填0.06锥度预备的弯曲根管的0.06锥度牙胶尖的评估。
Int Endod J. 2005 Feb;38(2):87-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00903.x.
5
Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.HERO 642与Hedström锉在去除弯曲根管中牙胶充填物方面的有效性:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2009 Nov;42(11):1050-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01624.x.
6
Evaluation of apical filling after root canal filling by 2 different techniques.采用两种不同技术对根管充填后的根尖充填情况进行评估。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2009 Apr;75(3):201a-201d.
7
Microleakage evaluation of roots filled with different obturation techniques and sealers.不同充填技术和封闭剂充填根管的微渗漏评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jul;108(1):124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
8
Ex-vivo area-metric analysis of root canal obturation using gutta-percha cones of different taper.使用不同锥度牙胶尖进行根管充填的体外面积测量分析
Int Endod J. 2009 Jun;42(6):491-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01533.x.
9
Efficacy of ProTaper retreatment system in root canals filled with gutta-percha and two endodontic sealers.ProTaper再治疗系统在充满牙胶和两种根管充填封闭剂的根管中的疗效。
J Endod. 2008 Oct;34(10):1223-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.020. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
10
Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material.三种技术在去除根管充填材料方面的疗效。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Oct;74(8):721.

引用本文的文献

1
Repair of Iatrogenic Furcal Perforation with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Seven-Year Follow-up.使用三氧化矿物凝聚体修复医源性根分叉穿孔:七年随访
Iran Endod J. 2017 Fall;12(4):516-520. doi: 10.22037/iej.v12i4.16888.
2
Comparison of Coronal Leakage in Tooth Preparation with Two Single File Systems and Three Obturation Techniques.两种单根管系统和三种根管充填技术在牙齿预备中冠部微渗漏的比较
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Oct;7(Suppl 2):S82-S87. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_205_17. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
3
Technical quality of a matching-taper single-cone filling technique following rotary instrumentation compared with lateral compaction after manual preparation: a retrospective study.
旋转器械预备后匹配锥度单锥充填技术与手动预备后侧向加压充填技术的技术质量:一项回顾性研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Mar;21(2):643-652. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1931-z. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
4
The effects of chlorhexidine and ethanol on push-out bond strength of fiber posts.洗必泰和乙醇对纤维桩推出粘结强度的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):96-100. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.173210.