Cartier Hugues, Trevidic Patrick, Rzany Berthold, Sattler Gerhard, Kestemont Philoppe, Kerrouche Nabil, Dhuin Jean-Charles
Centre Medical Saint Jean, Arras, France.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2012 Jan;11(1 Suppl):s17-26.
Injectable fillers are frequently used to restore volume and correct wrinkles in perioral region. However, evidence for perioral indications is scarce.
Assess the efficacy, patient satisfaction, and safety of new range of hyaluronic acid fillers (HA E) in perioral enhancement.
This was a multi-center, six-month, open-label study. At baseline, subjects could receive HA E Touch, HA E Classic, HA E Lips and HA E Deep for the treatments of lips, upper lip lines, nasolabial folds and marionette lines, and a touch-up infection was optional three weeks later. Lip Fullness Grading scale (for lips), wrinkle assessments (Lemperle Rating Scales for the remaining indications), adverse events, and local tolerance were evaluated at each visit, and 3-D volume analyses (for nasolabial folds and lips only) at each post-baseline visit. Optimal correction was defined as results obtained three weeks after last injection. A subject satisfaction questionnaire was performed three weeks after last infection.
Overall, HA E Lips was infected for lip enhancement, HA E Thouch and HA E Classic for upper lip lines, and HA E Classic and HA E Deep for both nasolabial folds and marionette lines. After six month, around a 1-grade improvement persisted according to the lip fullness and wrinkle assessment scales. The long duration of effect was confirmed by 3-D analyses, with 62.7-71.4 percent of volumes obtained at week 3 (optimal correction) maintained after six months. The majority of subjects (from 80% for upper lip lines with HA E Classic to 94.8% for nasolabial folds with HA E Deep) were satisfied or very satisfied with their aesthetic outcome. All products were safe and well-tolerated.
Perioral enhancement with HA E fillers led to sustained effect in terms of lip fullness, wrinkle and 3-D volume assessments, and high subject satisfaction.
注射填充剂常用于恢复口周区域的容量并改善皱纹。然而,关于口周适应症的证据很少。
评估新型透明质酸填充剂(HA E)系列用于口周美容的疗效、患者满意度和安全性。
这是一项为期六个月的多中心开放标签研究。在基线时,受试者可接受HA E Touch、HA E Classic、HA E Lips和HA E Deep用于治疗唇部、上唇纹、鼻唇沟和木偶纹,三周后可选择进行补打。每次就诊时评估唇部丰满度分级量表(用于唇部)、皱纹评估(其余适应症采用Lemperle评分量表)、不良事件和局部耐受性,基线后每次就诊时进行三维体积分析(仅用于鼻唇沟和唇部)。最佳矫正定义为最后一次注射三周后获得的结果。在最后一次注射三周后进行受试者满意度问卷调查。
总体而言,HA E Lips用于唇部填充,HA E Thouch和HA E Classic用于上唇纹,HA E Classic和HA E Deep用于鼻唇沟和木偶纹。六个月后,根据唇部丰满度和皱纹评估量表,持续改善约1级。三维分析证实了效果的持久性,六个月后维持了第3周(最佳矫正)时获得体积的62.7%-71.4%。大多数受试者(从上唇纹使用HA E Classic的80%到鼻唇沟使用HA E Deep的94.8%)对其美学效果感到满意或非常满意。所有产品均安全且耐受性良好。
使用HA E填充剂进行口周美容在唇部丰满度、皱纹和三维体积评估方面产生了持续效果,且受试者满意度高。