Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Memory. 2012 Jul;20(5):415-9. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.670249. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
The relationship between the suffix effect and the effect of irrelevant sound on serial recall of auditorily presented lists is investigated in this study. Contrary to the predictions of the phonological loop model, Hanley and Hayes (2012) reported that the irrelevant sound effect was abolished under articulatory suppression when a spoken suffix was added at the end of the list. The experiment reported in this paper uses a shorter list length (five items per list) than that employed by Hanley and Hayes. This is because it cannot realistically be argued that participants will abandon the use of phonological codes to retain the list items with sequences as short as this. Results replicated those of Hanley and Hayes (2012). There was a significant effect of irrelevant sound under articulatory suppression when the list items were followed by an auditory tone. Crucially, however, the effect of irrelevant sound under articulatory suppression was abolished when the list items were followed by a spoken suffix.
本研究考察了后缀效应与无关声音对听觉呈现列表序列回忆的影响之间的关系。与语音回路模型的预测相反,Hanley 和 Hayes(2012)报告说,当在列表末尾添加一个口语后缀时,在发音抑制下,无关声音的效果被消除了。本文报告的实验使用了比 Hanley 和 Hayes (2012)更长的列表长度(每个列表五个项目)。这是因为,不可能认为参与者会放弃使用语音代码来保留序列如此短的列表项。结果复制了 Hanley 和 Hayes(2012)的结果。当列表项后面跟着听觉音调时,在发音抑制下会产生显著的无关声音效应。然而,至关重要的是,当列表项后面跟着一个口语后缀时,在发音抑制下无关声音的效果被消除了。