Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Road, MS A-34, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(4):622-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
Point-of-use water treatment (i.e., water purification at the point of consumption) has proven effective in preventing diarrhea in developing countries. However, widespread adoption has not occurred, suggesting that implementation strategies have not motivated sustained behavior change. We conducted a systematic literature review of published behavioral research on factors influencing adoption of point-of-use water treatment in countries categorized as low- to medium-development on the United Nations Development Programme Human Development Index. We used 22 key words to search peer-reviewed literature from 1950 to 2010 from OVID Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Twenty-six (1.7%) of 1551 papers met our four inclusion criteria: 1) implemented a point-of-use water treatment intervention, 2) applied a behavioral intervention, 3) evaluated behavior change as the outcome, and 4) occurred in a low- or medium-development country. We reviewed these 26 publications for detailed descriptions of the water treatment intervention, theoretical rationales for the behavioral intervention, and descriptions of the evaluation. In 5 (19%) papers, details of the behavioral intervention were fully specified. Seven (27%) papers reported using a behavioral theory in the design of the intervention and evaluation of its impact. Ten (38%) studies used a comparison or control group; 5 provided detailed descriptions. Seven (27%) papers reported high sustained use of point-of-use water treatment with rates >50% at the last recorded follow-up. Despite documented health benefits of point-of-use water treatment interventions in reducing diarrheal diseases, we found limited peer-reviewed behavioral research on the topic. In addition, we found the existing literature often lacked detailed descriptions of the intervention for replication, seldom described the theoretical and empirical rationale for the implementation and evaluation of the intervention, and often had limitations in the evaluation methodology. The scarcity of papers on behavior change with respect to point-of-use water treatment technologies suggests that this field is underdeveloped.
即时水处理(即在消费点进行水净化)已被证明可有效预防发展中国家的腹泻。然而,这种方法并未得到广泛采用,这表明实施策略并未促使行为发生持续改变。我们对联合国开发计划署人类发展指数中被归类为中低等发展水平的国家中影响即时水处理采用的行为因素进行了系统的文献回顾。我们使用 22 个关键词在 OVID Medline、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 中搜索了 1950 年至 2010 年出版的同行评议文献。在 1551 篇论文中,有 26 篇(1.7%)符合我们的四项纳入标准:1)实施了即时水处理干预措施,2)应用了行为干预措施,3)将行为改变作为结果进行了评估,4)发生在中低等发展水平的国家。我们详细回顾了这 26 篇论文,内容涉及水处理干预措施的详细描述、行为干预措施的理论基础以及评估的描述。在 5 篇(19%)论文中,行为干预措施的细节得到了充分说明。7 篇(27%)论文报告了在干预措施的设计和影响评估中使用行为理论。10 项(38%)研究使用了对照组或对比组;其中 5 项提供了详细描述。7 篇(27%)论文报告了即时水处理的高持续使用率,在最后一次记录的随访中,使用率>50%。尽管即时水处理干预措施在减少腹泻病方面具有明显的健康益处,但我们发现关于该主题的同行评议行为研究非常有限。此外,我们发现现有文献往往缺乏对干预措施的详细描述,难以复制,很少描述干预措施的实施和评估的理论和经验基础,而且在评估方法学方面往往存在局限性。关于即时水处理技术的行为改变方面的论文稀缺,表明该领域尚未得到充分发展。