Suppr超能文献

塞音感知特征对发音清晰度评估模型的影响。

The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model.

机构信息

Mathworks, 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, Massachusetts 01760, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr;131(4):3051-68. doi: 10.1121/1.3682054.

Abstract

Studies on consonant perception under noise conditions typically describe the average consonant error as exponential in the Articulation Index (AI). While this AI formula nicely fits the average error over all consonants, it does not fit the error for any consonant at the utterance level. This study analyzes the error patterns of six stop consonants /p, t, k, b, d, g/ with four vowels (/α/, /ε/, /I/, /ae/), at the individual consonant (i.e., utterance) level. The findings include that the utterance error is essentially zero for signal to noise ratios (SNRs) at least -2 dB, for >78% of the stop consonant utterances. For these utterances, the error is essentially a step function in the SNR at the utterance's detection threshold. This binary error dependence is consistent with the audibility of a single binary defining acoustic feature, having zero error above the feature's detection threshold. Also 11% of the sounds have high error, defined as ≥ 20% for SNRs greater than or equal to -2 dB. A grand average across many such sounds, having a natural distribution in thresholds, results in the error being exponential in the AI measure, as observed. A detailed analysis of the variance from the AI error is provided along with a Bernoulli-trials analysis of the statistical significance.

摘要

在噪声环境下进行的辅音感知研究通常将清晰度指数(AI)中的辅音平均错误描述为指数函数。虽然这个 AI 公式很好地适用于所有辅音的平均错误,但它不适用于任何特定音素的错误。本研究分析了六个塞音/p, t, k, b, d, g/与四个元音/α/, /ε/, /I/, /ae/在单个音素(即发音)水平上的错误模式。研究结果表明,对于信噪比(SNR)至少为-2dB 的情况,至少有 78%的塞音发音的发音错误基本为零。对于这些发音,错误在发音检测阈值的 SNR 处基本上是阶跃函数。这种二进制错误的依赖性与单个二进制定义声学特征的可听度一致,在特征检测阈值以上,该特征的错误为零。另外,11%的发音错误较高,定义为 SNR 大于或等于-2dB 时大于等于 20%。许多此类声音的总体平均值在阈值上具有自然分布,导致错误呈 AI 测量的指数函数,正如所观察到的。沿着贝努利试验分析提供了对 AI 误差方差的详细分析以及统计显著性的分析。

相似文献

2
Consonant confusions in white noise.白噪声中的辅音混淆。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1220-33. doi: 10.1121/1.2913251.
4
Consonant recognition and the articulation index.辅音识别与清晰度指数。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Apr;117(4 Pt 1):2212-23. doi: 10.1121/1.1856231.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptual effects of plosive feature modification.塞音特征改变的感知效果。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Jan;131(1):478-91. doi: 10.1121/1.3665991.
2
Relationship between consonant recognition in noise and hearing threshold.噪声下辅音识别与听力阈值的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Apr;55(2):460-73. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0239). Epub 2011 Dec 22.
5
Consonant recognition loss in hearing impaired listeners.听力受损者的辅音识别损失。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Nov;126(5):2683-94. doi: 10.1121/1.3238257.
6
Multiband product rule and consonant identification.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):347-53. doi: 10.1121/1.3143785.
7
Consonant confusions in white noise.白噪声中的辅音混淆。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1220-33. doi: 10.1121/1.2913251.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验