• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国格洛斯特郡男性腹主动脉瘤筛查的 20 年回顾。

Twenty-year review of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men in the county of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.

机构信息

Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jul;56(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.069. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.069
PMID:22503187
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

An ultrasound screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in men began in Gloucestershire in 1990 and has been running for 20 years. This report examines the workload and results.

METHODS

We reviewed the screening database for attendance and outcome records from AAA surgery in Gloucestershire and postmortem and death certificate results looking for men who died from ruptured AAAs in the screening cohort. The setting was an AAA screening program in the county of Gloucestershire, UK. Men aged 65 were invited by year of birth to attend for an ultrasound screening for AAAs. Men with an aorta <2.6 cm were reassured and discharged; men with an aorta between 2.6 cm and 5.4 cm were offered follow-up surveillance; men with an aorta >5.4 cm were considered for intervention. We analyzed attendance rates, screening and surveillance outcomes, and intervention rates and outcomes over the 20 years of the study.

RESULTS

Some 61,982 men were invited, and 52,690 attended for screening (85% attendance). At first scan, 50,130 men (95.14%) had an aortic diameter <2.6 cm in diameter and were reassured and discharged; 148 men (0.28%) had an AAA >5.4 cm in diameter and were referred for possible treatment; 2412 (4.57%) had an aortic diameter between 2.6 and 5.4 cm and entered a program of ultrasound surveillance. The overall mean aortic diameter on initial scan fell from 2.1 cm to 1.7 cm during the study (reduction 0.015 cm/y, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0144-0.0156 cm/y; P < .0001). Some 631 patients with AAAs had intervention treatment with a perioperative mortality rate of 3.9%; during the same interval, 372 AAAs detected incidentally were treated, with a mortality rate of 6.7%. The number of ruptured AAAs treated annually in Gloucestershire fell during the study (χ(2) for trend = 18.31, df = 1; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Screening reduced the number of ruptured AAAs in Gloucestershire during the 20 years of the program. There has been a significant reduction of men with an abnormal aorta, as the mean aortic diameter of the 65-year-old male has reduced over 20 years.

摘要

目的

1990 年,格洛斯特郡开始了一项针对男性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的超声筛查计划,该计划已运行 20 年。本报告对其工作量和结果进行了评估。

方法

我们查阅了格洛斯特郡 AAA 手术的筛查数据库中的就诊记录和结果,以及尸检和死亡证明结果,以寻找在筛查队列中死于破裂 AAA 的男性。该研究的背景是英国格洛斯特郡的一个 AAA 筛查项目。65 岁的男性按照出生年份被邀请参加 AAA 超声筛查。主动脉直径<2.6cm 的男性被安抚并出院;主动脉直径在 2.6cm 至 5.4cm 之间的男性接受随访监测;主动脉直径>5.4cm 的男性考虑进行干预。我们分析了 20 年来的就诊率、筛查和监测结果以及干预率和结果。

结果

共有 61982 名男性受邀,其中 52690 名男性参加了筛查(85%的就诊率)。首次扫描时,50130 名男性(95.14%)的主动脉直径<2.6cm,被安抚并出院;148 名男性(0.28%)的 AAA 直径>5.4cm,被转诊接受可能的治疗;2412 名男性(4.57%)的主动脉直径在 2.6 至 5.4cm 之间,进入了超声监测项目。在研究期间,初次扫描的平均主动脉直径从 2.1cm 下降到 1.7cm(每年缩小 0.015cm,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.0144-0.0156cm/y;P<0.0001)。631 名患有 AAA 的患者接受了干预治疗,围手术期死亡率为 3.9%;在同一时期,372 例偶然发现的 AAA 接受了治疗,死亡率为 6.7%。格洛斯特郡每年接受治疗的破裂 AAA 数量在研究期间有所下降(趋势 χ(2)检验=18.31,df=1;P<0.0001)。

结论

该计划实施 20 年来,筛查降低了格洛斯特郡破裂 AAA 的数量。随着 65 岁男性的主动脉平均直径在 20 年内缩小,异常主动脉的男性数量也显著减少。

相似文献

1
Twenty-year review of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men in the county of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.英国格洛斯特郡男性腹主动脉瘤筛查的 20 年回顾。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jul;56(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.069. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
2
Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation.对 65 岁或以上的女性进行腹主动脉瘤筛查:建模研究和健康经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(43):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta22430.
3
Outcome in Men with a Screen-detected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Who are not Fit for Intervention.筛查发现的腹主动脉瘤但不适合干预的男性患者的结局
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;50(6):732-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.035. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
4
The long-term benefits of a single scan for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at age 65.65岁时进行一次腹主动脉瘤(AAA)扫描的长期益处。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 Jun;21(6):535-40. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1368.
5
Safety of Men With Small and Medium Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Under Surveillance in the NAAASP.NAAASP 中接受监测的小和中等腹部主动脉瘤男性患者的安全性。
Circulation. 2019 Mar 12;139(11):1371-1380. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036966.
6
Editor's choice: five-year outcomes in men screened for abdominal aortic aneurysm at 65 years of age: a population-based cohort study.编辑精选:65 岁男性接受腹主动脉瘤筛查的 5 年结果:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
7
Lessons learned about prevalence and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms from a 25-year ultrasound population screening programme.从 25 年的超声人群筛查计划中了解到的腹主动脉瘤的患病率和增长率的相关经验。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jan;105(1):68-74. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10715.
8
Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach.腹主动脉瘤筛查:一种实用方法。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Jan;82(1):59-63.
9
Reconsidering gender relative to risk of rupture in the contemporary management of abdominal aortic aneurysms.在腹主动脉瘤当代管理中重新审视性别与破裂风险的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Dec;62(6):1429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.079. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
10
Impact of the first 5 years of a national abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme.国家腹主动脉瘤筛查计划实施头 5 年的影响。
Br J Surg. 2016 Aug;103(9):1125-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10173. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of quality of life, anxiety, and depression over time in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm approaching the surgical threshold.接近手术阈值的腹主动脉瘤患者生活质量、焦虑和抑郁随时间的演变。
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae150.
2
Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database.机器学习在狭窄和动脉瘤检测中的应用:在一个生理逼真的虚拟患者数据库中的应用。
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2021 Dec;20(6):2097-2146. doi: 10.1007/s10237-021-01497-7. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
3
Current evidence on screening for renal cancer.
目前有关肾癌筛查的证据。
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Nov;17(11):637-642. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0363-3. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
4
Risk Prediction Models for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review.肾癌风险预测模型:系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Nov;7(6):1380-1390. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Survival, Prevalence, Progression and Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Results from Three Randomised Controlled Screening Trials Over Three Decades.腹主动脉瘤的生存、患病率、进展及修复:三项三十年随机对照筛查试验的结果
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jan 23;12:95-103. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S238502. eCollection 2020.
6
A Comparison of Aortoiliac Disease between Eastern and Western Countries.东西方国家主髂动脉疾病的比较
Vasc Specialist Int. 2019 Dec;35(4):184-188. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2019.35.4.184. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
7
Updates on Ultrasonography Imaging in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤超声成像的最新进展
Ann Vasc Dis. 2019 Sep 25;12(3):319-322. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.19-00070.
8
Consequences of screening in abdominal aortic aneurysm: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.腹主动脉瘤筛查的后果:一份问卷的编制与维度分析
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Sep 4;2:37. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0066-1. eCollection 2017.
9
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evolving Controversies and Uncertainties.腹主动脉瘤:不断演变的争议与不确定性
Int J Angiol. 2018 Jun;27(2):58-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1657771. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Epidemiology and screening for renal cancer.肾癌的流行病学和筛查。
World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1341-1353. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2286-7. Epub 2018 Apr 2.