Vanmaele Alexander, Branidis Petros, Karamanidou Maria, Bouwens Elke, Hoeks Sanne E, de Bruin Jorg L, Ten Raa Sander, Akkerhuis K Martijn, van Lier Felix, Budde Ricardo P J, Fioole Bram, Verhagen Hence J M, Boersma Eric, Kardys Isabella
Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae150.
Contrary to the impact of screening, the effect of long-term surveillance on the quality of life of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm is not well known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe patient-reported outcomes of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm approaching the surgical threshold.
This multicentre, observational cohort study included patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm with a maximum aneurysm diameter of greater than or equal to 40 mm. The EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (range -0.446 to 1, minimal clinically important difference 0.071), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire (0-21 points/subscale, minimal clinically important difference 1.7 points), and the short version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (0-6 points) were mailed to patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm at baseline and after 1 and 2 years or until abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery/death. Linear mixed-effects models were used to describe the evolution of patient-reported outcomes over time and investigate changes attributable to clinical characteristics.
In total, 291 to 294 responses to each questionnaire were available from 124 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm, of whom 34 underwent surgery during follow-up. The mean health-related quality of life and anxiety and depression scores over time were 0.781 (95% c.i. 0.749 to 0.814), 4.4 points (95% c.i. 3.9 to 4.9), and 4.6 points (95% c.i. 4.0 to 5.2) respectively. Anxiety and depression scores decreased in patients who underwent surgery with a mean of 2.8 (95% c.i. 1.1 to 4.6) and 2.0 (95% c.i. 0.4 to 3.6) points/year respectively, compared with patients who had not had surgery. Considering the minimal clinically important difference, patients with a primary education alone, compared with a secondary education, had higher or increasing anxiety and depression scores. Patients with a first-degree relative with an abdominal aortic aneurysm had a higher risk of clinical anxiety.
Although health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression remain stable over time on average, anxiety and depression decrease in patients approaching surgery. Patients with a family history of abdominal aortic aneurysm or a primary education alone experience more anxiety and/or depression and thus might benefit from a tailored approach during surveillance.
与筛查的影响相反,长期监测对腹主动脉瘤患者生活质量的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是描述接近手术阈值的腹主动脉瘤患者的患者报告结局。
这项多中心观察性队列研究纳入了最大动脉瘤直径大于或等于40毫米的腹主动脉瘤患者。欧洲五维健康量表问卷(范围-0.446至1,最小临床重要差异0.071)、医院焦虑抑郁量表问卷(0-21分/子量表,最小临床重要差异1.7分)和患者健康问卷简版(0-6分)在基线时以及1年和2年后或直至腹主动脉瘤手术/死亡时邮寄给腹主动脉瘤患者。使用线性混合效应模型来描述患者报告结局随时间的演变,并调查归因于临床特征的变化。
总共从124例腹主动脉瘤患者中获得了对每份问卷的291至294份回复,其中34例在随访期间接受了手术。随时间推移,平均健康相关生活质量、焦虑和抑郁评分分别为0.781(95%置信区间0.749至0.814)、4.4分(95%置信区间3.9至4.9)和4.6分(95%置信区间4.0至5.2)。与未接受手术的患者相比,接受手术的患者焦虑和抑郁评分分别以每年平均2.8(95%置信区间1.1至4.6)分和2.0(95%置信区间0.4至3.6)分的速度下降。考虑到最小临床重要差异,仅接受小学教育的患者与接受中学教育的患者相比,焦虑和抑郁评分更高或呈上升趋势。有腹主动脉瘤一级亲属的患者临床焦虑风险更高。
尽管平均而言,健康相关生活质量、焦虑和抑郁随时间保持稳定,但接近手术的患者焦虑和抑郁有所下降。有腹主动脉瘤家族史或仅接受小学教育的患者经历更多焦虑和/或抑郁,因此在监测期间可能受益于量身定制的方法。