School of Clinical Veterinary Science, Dolberry Building, Langford House, University of Bristol, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK.
Vet J. 2012 Oct;194(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
A husbandry advisory tool (HAT) was devised to help pig producers and their advisors identify and minimise possible risk factors for tail biting in finishing pigs. The prevalence of 83 risk factors identified from the literature and expert opinion was recorded on 65 commercial pig farms in England between May 2007 and July 2009. Those considered most important were associated with atmosphere/environment, environmental enrichment, the provision of food/drink and animal health factors. Forty-six farms received advice on minimising these risks and, of these, 27 also received a financial incentive to encourage the uptake of advice. A reduction in risk factors was observed on 42/57 farms visited at the end of the study, with the greatest reduction occurring on the farms that had been incentivised. However, farms not receiving advice also had reduced risk factors associated with atmosphere/environment and stocking density over the course of the study. In conclusion, while some risk factors are structural and require substantial capital investment to change, a significant reduction in the risk of tail biting can be achieved on many farms through the systematic evaluation and modification of management practices.
一个养殖咨询工具(HAT)被设计用来帮助养猪生产者及其顾问识别和最小化肥育猪咬尾的可能风险因素。从文献和专家意见中确定的 83 个风险因素的流行情况于 2007 年 5 月至 2009 年 7 月在英格兰的 65 个商业猪场进行了记录。那些被认为最重要的因素与环境/环境、环境丰富、食物/饮料供应和动物健康因素有关。46 个猪场收到了关于减少这些风险的建议,其中 27 个猪场还获得了财务激励,以鼓励采纳建议。在研究结束时,对 57 个接受访问的猪场中的 42 个观察到风险因素减少,在接受激励的猪场中风险因素减少最多。然而,在研究过程中,未接受建议的猪场也减少了与环境/环境和饲养密度有关的风险因素。总之,虽然有些风险因素是结构性的,需要大量的资本投资来改变,但通过系统地评估和修改管理实践,可以在许多猪场显著降低咬尾的风险。