Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093-0956,USA.
Gastroenterology. 2012 Jul;143(1):62-69.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is unknown.
Four placebo-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of abatacept as induction (IP) and maintenance (MP) therapy in adults with active, moderate-to-severe CD (CD-IP; CD-MP) and UC (UC-IP1; UC-MP). In CD-IP and UC-IP1, 451 patients with CD and 490 patients with UC were randomized to abatacept 30, 10, or 3 mg/kg (according to body weight) or placebo, and dosed at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8. In MP, 90 patients with CD and 131 patients with UC who responded to abatacept at week 12 in the induction trials were randomized to abatacept 10 mg/kg or placebo every 4 weeks through week 52.
In CD-IP, 17.2%, 10.2%, and 15.5% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at weeks 8 and 12, vs 14.4% receiving placebo (P = .611, P = .311, and P = .812, respectively). In UC-IP1, 21.4%, 19.0%, and 20.3% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at week 12, vs 29.5% receiving placebo (P = .124, P = .043, and P = .158, respectively). In CD-MP, 23.8% vs 11.1% of abatacept vs placebo patients were in remission at week 52. In UC-MP, 12.5% vs 14.1% of patients receiving abatacept vs placebo were in remission at week 52. Safety generally was comparable between groups.
The studies showed that abatacept is not efficacious for the treatment of moderate-to-severe CD or UC.
选择性共刺激调节剂阿巴西普在克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)中的疗效尚不清楚。
四项安慰剂对照试验评估了阿巴西普作为诱导(IP)和维持(MP)治疗在活动期、中重度 CD(CD-IP;CD-MP)和 UC(UC-IP1;UC-MP)成人中的疗效和安全性。在 CD-IP 和 UC-IP1 中,451 例 CD 患者和 490 例 UC 患者被随机分配至阿巴西普 30、10 或 3mg/kg(根据体重)或安慰剂组,并在 0、2、4 和 8 周进行给药。在 MP 中,在诱导试验中第 12 周对阿巴西普有应答的 90 例 CD 患者和 131 例 UC 患者被随机分配至阿巴西普 10mg/kg 或安慰剂组,每 4 周给药 1 次,直至第 52 周。
在 CD-IP 中,接受阿巴西普 30、10 和 3mg/kg 治疗的患者在第 8 周和第 12 周的临床应答率分别为 17.2%、10.2%和 15.5%,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者为 14.4%(P=0.611,P=0.311,P=0.812)。在 UC-IP1 中,接受阿巴西普 30、10 和 3mg/kg 治疗的患者在第 12 周的临床应答率分别为 21.4%、19.0%和 20.3%,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者为 29.5%(P=0.124,P=0.043,P=0.158)。在 CD-MP 中,第 52 周时阿巴西普组的缓解率为 23.8%,而安慰剂组为 11.1%。在 UC-MP 中,第 52 周时接受阿巴西普治疗的患者缓解率为 12.5%,而安慰剂组为 14.1%。两组之间的安全性通常相似。
这些研究表明,阿巴西普对治疗中重度 CD 或 UC 无效。