World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Vaccinology and Neonatal Immunology, Department of Pathology-Immunology, Medical Faculty of the University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
J Immunol. 2012 May 15;188(10):4828-37. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103183. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
The dendritic cell (DC) targeting/activation patterns required to elicit Th1/Th17 responses remain undefined. One postulated requirement was that of a physical linkage between Ags and immunomodulators. Accordingly, the separate same-site administration of Ag85B-ESAT-6 (hybrid-1 protein; H1), a mycobacterial fusion Ag, and the CAF01 liposome-based adjuvant induced similar Ab and weak Th2 responses as those of coformulated H1/CAF01 but failed to elicit Th1/Th17 responses. Yet, this separate same-site injection generated the same type and number of activated Ag(+)/adjuvant(+) DCs in the draining lymph nodes (LN) as that of protective H1/CAF01 immunization. Thus, targeting/activating the same DC population by Ag and adjuvant is not sufficient to elicit Th1/Th17 responses. To identify the determinants of Th1/Th17 adjuvanticity, in vivo tracking experiments using fluorescently labeled Ag and adjuvant identified that a separate same-site administration elicits an additional early Ag(+)/adjuvant(-) DC population with a nonactivated phenotype, resulting from the earlier targeting of LN DCs by H1 than by CAF01 molecules. This asynchronous targeting pattern was mimicked by the injection of free H1 prior to or with, but not after, H1/CAF01 or H1/CpG/ aluminum hydroxide immunization. The injection of soluble OVA similarly prevented the induction of Th1 responses by OVA/CAF01. Using adoptively transferred OT-2 cells, we show that the Ag targeting of LN DCs prior to their activation generates nonactivated Ag-pulsed DCs that recruit Ag-specific T cells, trigger their initial proliferation, but interfere with Th1 induction in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, the synchronization of DC targeting and activation is a critical determinant for Th1/Th17 adjuvanticity.
树突状细胞 (DC) 靶向/激活模式对于引发 Th1/Th17 反应尚不清楚。一种假设的要求是抗原和免疫调节剂之间存在物理联系。因此,分别在同一部位给予 Ag85B-ESAT-6(杂交 1 蛋白;H1)、一种分枝杆菌融合抗原和 CAF01 基于脂质体的佐剂,可诱导与 H1/CAF01 相同的 Ab 和弱 Th2 反应,但不能诱导 Th1/Th17 反应。然而,这种单独的同一部位注射在引流淋巴结 (LN) 中产生了与保护性 H1/CAF01 免疫相同类型和数量的活化 Ag(+)/佐剂(+)DC。因此,通过抗原和佐剂靶向/激活相同的 DC 群体不足以引发 Th1/Th17 反应。为了确定 Th1/Th17 佐剂的决定因素,使用荧光标记的抗原和佐剂进行体内追踪实验,确定在同一部位分别给予抗原和佐剂会引发另外一种早期的 Ag(+)/佐剂(-)DC 群体,其表型未被激活,这是由于 H1 比 CAF01 分子更早地靶向 LN DC。这种非同步靶向模式通过在 H1/CAF01 或 H1/CpG/氢氧化铝免疫之前或同时而不是之后注射游离 H1 来模拟。可溶性 OVA 的注射也可防止 OVA/CAF01 诱导 Th1 反应。使用过继转移的 OT-2 细胞,我们表明在 LN DC 被激活之前对其进行抗原靶向可产生未被激活的抗原脉冲 DC,这些 DC 可招募抗原特异性 T 细胞,触发其初始增殖,但以剂量依赖的方式干扰 Th1 的诱导。因此,DC 靶向和激活的同步是 Th1/Th17 佐剂的关键决定因素。