Pauly M V, Hillman A L, Kerstein J
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Med Care. 1990 Nov;28(11):1013-24. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199011000-00004.
The recent rapid growth of HMOs has resulted in a proliferation of contractual arrangements that offer financial incentives to induce primary care doctors to change the way they practice medicine. The impact of these incentives varies with the different incentives and with the environments in which the incentives are implemented. Although financial incentives exist in some form in the great majority of HMOs, there has been no detailed and valid information available on the way these physician incentives are managed or on the characteristics of the standard operating "climate" in which the incentives exist. This study was designed to measure a firm (organizational) characteristic hypothesized to be related to the firm's effort, ability, or desire to make financial incentives work strongly. The characteristic considered is whether the firm is a for-profit or a not-for-profit organization. The goal of this study was to provide a direct test of the relationship between HMO ownership type and the effectiveness of primary care physician incentives. Results of the study indicate that for-profit ownership does enhance the power (or the need) of management to offer effective rewards for parsimonious use of health care resources.
近期健康维护组织(HMO)的迅速发展导致了合同安排的激增,这些合同安排提供经济激励措施,以促使初级保健医生改变他们的行医方式。这些激励措施的影响因不同的激励措施以及实施激励措施的环境而异。尽管绝大多数健康维护组织都以某种形式存在经济激励措施,但对于这些针对医生的激励措施是如何管理的,或者激励措施存在的标准运营“氛围”的特征,却没有详细且有效的信息。本研究旨在衡量一种企业(组织)特征,该特征被假设与企业使经济激励措施有效发挥作用的努力、能力或意愿相关。所考虑的特征是该企业是营利性组织还是非营利性组织。本研究的目的是直接检验健康维护组织所有权类型与初级保健医生激励措施有效性之间的关系。研究结果表明,营利性所有权确实增强了管理层为节约使用医疗资源提供有效奖励的权力(或需求)。