Johnson Aaron J, Harwin Steven F, Krackow Kenneth A, Mont Michael A
Fellow, Center for Joint Preservation and Reconstruction, Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
The Center for Reconstructive Joint Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York.
Surg Technol Int. 2011 Dec;21:183-8.
Numerous reports have linked malaligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components with increased wear, poor functional outcomes, and possibly early failure due to component loosening. Consequently, proper alignment is critical to a successful outcome. This article will review: the normal mechanical alignment of the knee, classical alignment in TKA, anatomic alignment in TKA, intraoperative reference points for alignment, and the potential for new alignment schema based on the kinematic axes of knee movement. Along with our increased understanding of how the knee functions, modern total knee arthroplasty has evolved to restore a neutral mechanical axis when prostheses are implanted. Although historically the goal has been to aim to be within 3 degrees of this axis, recent reports have challenged the validity of the claim that outliers have an increased risk for revision. In addition, new alignment schemes have been developed based on the kinematic axes, but as yet we await verification of results to determine whether they increase the ability of total knee arthroplasty to provide a better-functioning and longer-lasting knee for the patient.
众多报告已将全膝关节置换术(TKA)组件排列不齐与磨损增加、功能结果不佳以及可能因组件松动导致的早期失败联系起来。因此,正确的排列对于成功的手术结果至关重要。本文将回顾:膝关节的正常机械排列、TKA中的经典排列、TKA中的解剖排列、排列的术中参考点以及基于膝关节运动学轴的新排列方案的潜力。随着我们对膝关节功能理解的增加,现代全膝关节置换术已发展为在植入假体时恢复中立的机械轴。尽管历史上的目标是瞄准在此轴的3度范围内,但最近的报告对异常值有更高翻修风险这一说法的有效性提出了质疑。此外,基于运动学轴开发了新的排列方案,但目前我们仍在等待结果验证,以确定它们是否能提高全膝关节置换术为患者提供功能更好、使用寿命更长的膝关节的能力。