Shelton T J, Nedopil A J, Howell S M, Hull M L
University of California, Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1319-1328. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0066.R1.
The aims of this study were to determine the proportion of patients with outlier varus or valgus alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether those with outlier varus or valgus alignment have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments of the knee than those with in-range alignment and whether measurements of the alignment of the limb, knee and components predict compartment forces.
The intra-operative forces in the medial and lateral compartments were measured with an instrumented tibial insert in 67 patients who underwent a kinematically aligned TKA during passive movement. The mean of the forces at full extension, 45° and 90° of flexion determined the force in the medial and lateral compartments. Measurements of the alignment of the limb and the components included the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, proximal medial tibial angle (PMTA), and distal lateral femoral angle (DLFA). Measurements of the alignment of the knee and the components included the tibiofemoral angle (TFA), tibial component angle (TCA) and femoral component angle (FCA). Alignment was measured on post-operative, non-weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) scanograms and categorised as varus or valgus outlier or in-range in relation to mechanically aligned criteria.
The proportion of patients with outlier varus or valgus alignment was 16%/24% for the HKA angle, 55%/0% for the PMTA, 0%/57% for the DLFA, 25%/12% for the TFA, 100%/0% for the TCA, and 0%/64% for the FCA. In general, the forces in the medial and lateral compartments of those with outlier alignment were not different from those with in-range alignment except for the TFA, in which patients with outlier varus alignment had a mean paradoxical force which was 6 lb higher in the lateral compartment than those with in-range alignment. None of the measurements of alignment of the limb, knee and components predicted the force in the medial or lateral compartment.
Although kinematically aligned TKA has a high proportion of varus or valgus outliers using mechanically aligned criteria, the intra-operative forces in the medial and lateral compartments of patients with outlier alignment were comparable with those with in-range alignment, with no evidence of overload of the medial or lateral compartment of the knee. Cite this article: 2017;99-B:1319-28.
本研究旨在确定在运动学对齐的全膝关节置换术(TKA)中,内翻或外翻对线异常患者的比例;与对线正常的患者相比,内翻或外翻对线异常患者膝关节内侧或外侧间室的受力是否更大;以及肢体、膝关节和假体组件的对线测量能否预测间室受力情况。
在67例行运动学对齐TKA的患者被动活动期间,使用仪器化的胫骨假体衬垫测量内侧和外侧间室的术中受力。伸直位、45°和90°屈曲位的受力平均值确定内侧和外侧间室的受力。肢体和假体组件对线的测量包括髋-膝-踝(HKA)角、胫骨近端内侧角(PMTA)和股骨远端外侧角(DLFA)。膝关节和假体组件对线的测量包括胫股角(TFA)、胫骨假体组件角(TCA)和股骨假体组件角(FCA)。在术后非负重前后位(AP)X线片上测量对线情况,并根据机械对线标准将其分类为内翻或外翻异常或正常。
HKA角、PMTA、DLFA、TFA、TCA和FCA的内翻或外翻异常对线患者比例分别为16%/24%、55%/0%、0%/57%、25%/12%、100%/0%和0%/64%。一般来说,除TFA外,对线异常患者内侧和外侧间室的受力与对线正常患者无差异,其中内翻异常对线患者外侧间室的平均矛盾受力比对线正常患者高6磅。肢体、膝关节和假体组件的对线测量均不能预测内侧或外侧间室的受力。
尽管按照机械对线标准,运动学对齐的TKA中有很大比例的内翻或外翻异常情况,但对线异常患者内侧和外侧间室的术中受力与对线正常患者相当,没有证据表明膝关节内侧或外侧间室存在过载情况。引用本文:2017;99-B:1319 - 28。