Suppr超能文献

比较数字式和光学模拟手持折射仪测量犬尿液比重。

Comparison of a digital and an optical analogue hand-held refractometer for the measurement of canine urine specific gravity.

机构信息

Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, Division of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.

出版信息

Vet Rec. 2012 May 5;170(18):463. doi: 10.1136/vr.100348. Epub 2012 Apr 14.

Abstract

Urine specific gravity (USG) is used clinically as a measure of urine concentration, and is routinely assessed by refractometry. A comparison between optical analogue and digital refractometers for evaluation of canine urine has not been reported. The aim of this study was to compare a digital and an optical analogue hand-held refractometer for the measurement of canine USG, and to assess correlation with urine osmolality. Prospective study. Free-catch urine samples were collected from 285 hospitalised adult dogs, and paired USG readings were obtained with a digital and an optical analogue refractometer. In 50 dogs, urine osmolality was also measured using a freezing point depression osmometer. There was a small but statistically significant difference between the two refractometers (P<0.001), with the optical analogue refractometer reading higher than the digital refractometer (mean difference 0.0006, sd 0.0012). Paired refractometer measurements varied by <0.002 in 91.5 per cent of cases. The optical analogue and digital refractometer readings showed excellent correlation with osmolality (r=0.980 and r=0.977, respectively, P<0.001 in both cases). Despite statistical significance, the difference between the two refractometers is unlikely to be clinically significant. Both instruments provide an accurate assessment of USG in dogs.

摘要

尿比重(USG)临床上用作尿液浓缩的指标,通常通过折射计进行评估。尚未报道过光学模拟和数字折射计在犬尿液评估方面的比较。本研究旨在比较数字和光学模拟手持式折射计测量犬 USG 的性能,并评估与尿液渗透压的相关性。前瞻性研究。从 285 只住院成年犬中采集自由捕捉的尿液样本,并使用数字和光学模拟折射计获得配对的 USG 读数。在 50 只犬中,还使用冰点降低渗透压计测量了尿液渗透压。两种折射计之间存在微小但具有统计学意义的差异(P<0.001),光学模拟折射计的读数高于数字折射计(平均差异 0.0006,标准差 0.0012)。在 91.5%的情况下,配对折射计测量值的差异<0.002。光学模拟和数字折射计读数与渗透压具有极好的相关性(r=0.980 和 r=0.977,两种情况下均 P<0.001)。尽管存在统计学意义,但两种折射计之间的差异不太可能具有临床意义。两种仪器均可准确评估犬的 USG。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验