Williams Daryl Lindsay, Zeng James M, Alexander Karl D, Andrews David T
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville 3050, Australia.
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:405812. doi: 10.1155/2012/405812. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
We conducted a randomised single-blind controlled trial comparing the LMA-Unique (LMAU) and the AMBU AuraOnce (AMBU) disposable laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia. Eighty-two adult patients (ASA status I-IV) were randomly allocated to receive the LMAU or AMBU and were blinded to device selection. Patients received a standardized anesthetic and all airway devices were inserted by trained anaesthetists. Size selection was guided by manufacturer recommendations. All data were collected by a single, unblinded observer. When compared with the LMAU, the AMBU produced significantly higher airway sealing pressures (AMBU 20 ± 6; LMAU 15 ± 7 cm H(2)O; P = 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the two devices for overall success rate, insertion time, number of adjustments, laryngeal alignment, blood-staining, and sore throat (P ≥ 0.05). The AMBU AuraOnce disposable laryngeal mask provided a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure compared to the LMA Unique in spontaneously breathing adult patients.
我们进行了一项随机单盲对照试验,比较了LMA-Unique(LMAU)和AMBU AuraOnce(AMBU)一次性喉罩在接受全身麻醉的自主呼吸成年患者中的应用。82例成年患者(ASA分级I-IV级)被随机分配接受LMAU或AMBU,且对设备选择不知情。患者接受标准化麻醉,所有气道设备均由训练有素的麻醉医生插入。尺寸选择遵循制造商的建议。所有数据均由一名未设盲的观察者收集。与LMAU相比,AMBU产生的气道密封压力显著更高(AMBU 20±6;LMAU 15±7 cm H₂O;P = 0.001)。两种设备在总体成功率、插入时间、调整次数、喉位对齐、血染和咽痛方面无统计学差异(P≥0.05)。在自主呼吸的成年患者中,与LMA Unique相比,AMBU AuraOnce一次性喉罩提供了更高的口咽漏气压。