Tsai Chi-Yu, Lee Yi-Hao, Wu Te-Ju, Lin Shiu-Shiung, Lai Jui-Pin, Chang Yu-Jen
Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 123, Dapi Rd., Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung City 83340, Taiwan.
Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 123, Dapi Rd., Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung City 83340, Taiwan.
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 29;12(7):1062. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071062.
Traditional distraction osteogenesis (DO) with the tooth-borne rigid external device (RED) system was regularly used in treating patients with cleft-related maxillary hypoplasia. However, the bone-borne RED system with miniplates and bone screws has currently become an effective treatment. This retrospective study was to compare bone-borne RED with traditional tooth-borne RED in distraction effectiveness, blood loss, operative time, and long-term stability.
Twenty-two growing patients who underwent RED therapy were divided into two groups: eleven patients utilizing the bone-borne RED system with the transcutaneous wire attached with skeletal anchorage; another eleven patients using the traditional tooth-borne RED system with the intra-oral device attached with dental anchorage. Serial lateral cephalograms were analyzed for comparing treatment outcomes and stability in 1 month, 6 months, and 1.5 years after distraction.
In bone-borne RED group, the maxilla was advanced by 19.98 mm with slight clockwise rotation of 0.40° and minimal palatal inclination change of incisor by -3.94°. In traditional tooth-borne RED group, the maxilla showed less advancement by 14.52 mm, with significant counter-clockwise rotation of -11.23° and excessive palatal inclination change of incisor by -10.86°. Although operative time was longer in the bone-borne RED group by 38.4 min, this did not bring about greater blood loss.
the bone-borne RED via transcutaneous wire system provides an easy, simple, and comfortable procedure as well as favorable long-term stability in maxillary distraction.
传统的牵张成骨术(DO)采用牙支持式坚固外固定装置(RED)系统,常用于治疗与腭裂相关的上颌骨发育不全患者。然而,目前采用微型钢板和骨螺钉的骨支持式RED系统已成为一种有效的治疗方法。本回顾性研究旨在比较骨支持式RED与传统牙支持式RED在牵张效果、失血量、手术时间和长期稳定性方面的差异。
22例接受RED治疗的生长发育期患者被分为两组:11例患者采用经皮钢丝连接骨锚的骨支持式RED系统;另外11例患者使用经口内装置连接牙锚的传统牙支持式RED系统。对系列头颅侧位片进行分析,以比较牵张后1个月、6个月和1.5年的治疗效果和稳定性。
在骨支持式RED组中,上颌骨前移19.98mm,顺时针轻微旋转0.40°,切牙腭向倾斜变化最小,为-3.94°。在传统牙支持式RED组中,上颌骨前移较少,为14.52mm,逆时针显著旋转-11.23°,切牙腭向倾斜变化过大,为-10.86°。虽然骨支持式RED组的手术时间长38.4分钟,但这并没有导致更多的失血量。
经皮钢丝系统的骨支持式RED在上颌骨牵张中提供了一种简单、舒适的手术方式以及良好的长期稳定性。