• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

燃料里程和混合壁:美国乙醇分配的成本和排放。

Fuel miles and the blend wall: costs and emissions from ethanol distribution in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 215B McLaughlin Hall, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94704, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2012 May 15;46(10):5285-93. doi: 10.1021/es204547s. Epub 2012 May 4.

DOI:10.1021/es204547s
PMID:22506875
Abstract

From 1991 to 2009, U.S. production of ethanol increased 10-fold, largely due to government programs motivated by climate change, energy security, and economic development goals. As low-level ethanol-gasoline blends have not consistently outperformed ethanol-free gasoline in vehicle performance or tailpipe emissions, national-level economic and environmental goals could be accomplished more efficiently by concentrating consumption of gasoline containing 10% ethanol (i.e., E10) near producers to minimize freight activity. As the domestic transportation of ethanol increased 10-fold in metric ton-kilometers (t-km) from 2000 to 2009, the portion of t-km potentially justified by the E10 blend wall increased from less than 40% to 80%. However, we estimate 10 billion t-km took place annually from 2004 to 2009 for reasons other than the blend wall. This "unnecessary" transportation resulted in more than $240 million in freight costs, 90 million L of diesel consumption, 300,000 metric tons of CO(2)-e emissions, and 440 g of human intake of PM(2.5). By 2009, the marginal savings from enabling Iowa to surpass E10 would have exceeded 2.5 g CO(2)-e/MJ and $0.12/gallon of ethanol, as the next-closest customer was 1600 km away. The use of a national network model enables estimation of marginal transportation impacts from subnational policies, and benefits from policies encouraging concentrated consumption of renewable fuels.

摘要

从 1991 年到 2009 年,美国的乙醇产量增长了 10 倍,这主要是由于政府出于气候变化、能源安全和经济发展目标的考虑而实施了相关计划。由于低浓度乙醇-汽油混合物在车辆性能或尾气排放方面并未始终优于无乙醇汽油,因此,通过将含有 10%乙醇(即 E10)的汽油集中在靠近生产商的地方消费,最大限度地减少运输活动,国家层面的经济和环境目标可能会更有效地实现。2000 年至 2009 年,乙醇的国内运输量以公吨-公里(t-km)计算增长了 10 倍,E10 混合壁增加的潜在 t-km 比例从不到 40%增加到 80%。然而,我们估计,2004 年至 2009 年,每年有 100 亿公吨-公里的运输量并非出于混合壁的原因。这种“不必要”的运输造成了超过 2.4 亿美元的运费、9000 万升柴油消耗、30 万吨二氧化碳排放和 44 万克人体摄入的 PM(2.5)。到 2009 年,使爱荷华州能够超越 E10 的边际节省将超过 2.5 克二氧化碳-e/兆瓦时和 0.12 美元/加仑乙醇,因为下一个最接近的客户在 1600 公里之外。国家网络模型的使用可以估计来自次国家政策的边际运输影响,并从鼓励可再生燃料集中消费的政策中获益。

相似文献

1
Fuel miles and the blend wall: costs and emissions from ethanol distribution in the United States.燃料里程和混合壁:美国乙醇分配的成本和排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 May 15;46(10):5285-93. doi: 10.1021/es204547s. Epub 2012 May 4.
2
A spatially and temporally explicit life cycle inventory of air pollutants from gasoline and ethanol in the United States.美国汽油和乙醇的空气污染物生命周期清单的时空明确分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Oct 16;46(20):11408-17. doi: 10.1021/es3010514. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
3
A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.替代汽车燃料的生命周期比较。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Oct;50(10):1769-79.
4
Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment.柳枝稷衍生的替代运输液体燃料的能源与排放效益:燃料生命周期评估
Biotechnol Prog. 2006 Jul-Aug;22(4):1012-24. doi: 10.1021/bp050371p.
5
Effects of ethanol-blended gasoline on air pollutant emissions from motorcycle.乙醇混合汽油对摩托车空气污染物排放的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Sep 15;407(19):5257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.017. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
6
Quantification of gasoline-ethanol blend emissions effects.量化汽油-乙醇混合燃料排放的影响。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021 Jan;71(1):3-22. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2020.1754964. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
7
Assessment of Mexico's program to use ethanol as transportation fuel: impact of 6% ethanol-blended fuel on emissions of light-duty gasoline vehicles.评估墨西哥使用乙醇作为交通燃料的计划:6%乙醇混合燃料对轻型汽油车排放的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Feb;173(1-4):343-60. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1391-x. Epub 2010 Mar 13.
8
Emissions from a flex fuel GDI vehicle operating on ethanol fuels show marked contrasts in chemical, physical and toxicological characteristics as a function of ethanol content.使用乙醇燃料的灵活燃料 GDI 车辆的排放物在化学、物理和毒理学特性方面表现出显著差异,这取决于乙醇含量。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Sep 15;683:749-761. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.279. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Assessing the co-benefits of greenhouse gas reduction: health benefits of particulate matter related inspection and maintenance programs in Bangkok, Thailand.评估温室气体减排的协同效益:泰国曼谷与细颗粒物相关的检查和维护计划带来的健康效益。
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Apr 15;409(10):1774-85. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.051. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
10
Greenhouse gases emissions and energy use of wheat grain-based bioethanol fuel blends.小麦基生物乙醇燃料混合物的温室气体排放和能源利用。
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Oct 1;408(21):5010-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.046. Epub 2010 Aug 7.