Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.
Mov Disord. 2012 Sep 15;27(11):1387-91. doi: 10.1002/mds.25000. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Though microelectrode recordings likely increase the risks and costs of DBS, incremental improvement in accuracy may translate into improved outcomes that justify these risks and costs. Clinically based, controlled studies to resolve these issues are problematic. Until such studies are reported, physicians must rely on indirect evidence. The spatial variability of physiologically defined optimal targets, as determined by microelectrode recording (MER), necessary for targeting the STN was calculated. Study of the effectiveness of a MER algorithm was based on the number of penetrations required. The radius of the volume with a 99% chance of including the physiologically defined optimal target, based on 108 cases, was 4.5 mm. This is larger than the estimated radius of the DBS effect, which is variously estimated to be 2 to 3.9 mm. The 99% confidence radius in the plane orthogonal to the lead was 3.2 mm. In 70% of cases, the imaging-based trajectories corresponded to the physiologically defined optimal target. For the remaining 30% of cases, 70% required only a single additional MER tract. The radii of the 99% confidence volume and area may be larger than the effective radius of stimulation. Surveying within those volumes or areas is therefore necessary to assure that at least 99% of cases will cover the physiologically defined target. The MER algorithm was robust in detecting the physiologically defined optimal target. However, there are significant caveats in interpretation of the data.
尽管微电极记录可能会增加 DBS 的风险和成本,但准确性的逐步提高可能会转化为改善的结果,从而证明这些风险和成本是合理的。基于临床的对照研究来解决这些问题是有问题的。在这些研究报告之前,医生必须依靠间接证据。通过微电极记录(MER)确定的与 STN 靶向相关的生理定义最佳靶点的空间变异性进行了计算。MER 算法有效性的研究基于所需穿透的数量。基于 108 例病例,基于生理定义的最佳靶点有 99%的概率包含的体积的半径为 4.5 毫米。这大于 DBS 效应的估计半径,DBS 效应的估计半径各不相同,约为 2 至 3.9 毫米。与导联正交的平面上的 99%置信半径为 3.2 毫米。在 70%的病例中,基于成像的轨迹与生理定义的最佳靶点相对应。对于其余 30%的病例,有 70%仅需要额外的单个 MER 轨迹。99%置信区间体积和面积的半径可能大于刺激的有效半径。因此,需要在这些体积或区域内进行调查,以确保至少 99%的病例会覆盖生理定义的目标。MER 算法在检测生理定义的最佳靶点方面是稳健的。然而,数据的解释存在重大的限制。