Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208-3599, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Feb;40(1):11-8. doi: 10.1177/1090198111431275. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of an educational intervention on prostate cancer screening behavior and knowledge. Participants were 104 African American men, 45 years and older, who had not been screened for prostate cancer with a prostate-specific antigen and/or digital rectal exam within the past year. All participants received an intervention delivered by trained lay community educators using a prostate cancer educational brochure developed in collaboration with the community, with structured interviews preintervention and 3 months postintervention. The main study outcomes included prostate-specific antigen screening rates during the 3-month interval and knowledge, barriers to screenings, and decisional conflict around screening. Compared with the 46 men who did not get screened, the 58 participants who got screened were more likely to have greater than a high school education, annual household incomes ≥$25,000, and a family history of non-prostate cancer (p < .05). Average knowledge scores increased, and barriers to screening scores decreased, from preintervention to postintervention only for participants who had been screened (p < .05). The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of an academic institution collaborating with the African American community to develop a successful prostate cancer educational intervention, an approach that can be expanded to other cancers and other chronic diseases.
本研究旨在评估教育干预对前列腺癌筛查行为和知识的影响。参与者为 104 名年龄在 45 岁及以上的非裔美国男性,他们在过去一年中没有通过前列腺特异性抗原和/或直肠指检进行前列腺癌筛查。所有参与者均接受了由经过培训的社区外展教育者提供的干预措施,该干预措施使用了与社区合作开发的前列腺癌教育手册,在干预前和干预后 3 个月进行了结构化访谈。主要研究结果包括在 3 个月间隔内进行前列腺特异性抗原筛查的比例以及对筛查的了解、障碍和决策冲突。与未接受筛查的 46 名男性相比,接受筛查的 58 名参与者更有可能接受过高中以上教育、年收入≥25,000 美元以及非前列腺癌家族史(p<.05)。仅对接受筛查的参与者而言,从干预前到干预后,平均知识得分增加,而筛查障碍得分降低(p<.05)。这项研究的结果表明,学术机构与非裔美国社区合作开发成功的前列腺癌教育干预措施是可行且有效的,这种方法可以扩展到其他癌症和其他慢性疾病。