Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 1;109(18):7008-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117133109. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Mammals are characterized by the complex adaptations of their dentition, which are an indication that diet has played a critical role in their evolutionary history. Although much attention has focused on diet and the adaptations of specific taxa, the role of diet in large-scale diversification patterns remains unresolved. Contradictory hypotheses have been proposed, making prediction of the expected relationship difficult. We show that net diversification rate (the cumulative effect of speciation and extinction), differs significantly among living mammals, depending upon trophic strategy. Herbivores diversify fastest, carnivores are intermediate, and omnivores are slowest. The tempo of transitions between the trophic strategies is also highly biased: the fastest rates occur into omnivory from herbivory and carnivory and the lowest transition rates are between herbivory and carnivory. Extant herbivore and carnivore diversity arose primarily through diversification within lineages, whereas omnivore diversity evolved by transitions into the strategy. The ability to specialize and subdivide the trophic niche allowed herbivores and carnivores to evolve greater diversity than omnivores.
哺乳动物的牙齿结构非常复杂,这表明饮食在其进化历史中发挥了关键作用。尽管人们对饮食和特定类群的适应性关注较多,但饮食在大规模多样化模式中的作用仍未得到解决。提出了相互矛盾的假设,使得难以预测预期的关系。我们表明,净多样化率(物种形成和灭绝的累积效应)因营养策略而异,在现存的哺乳动物中存在显著差异。食草动物的多样化速度最快,肉食动物居中,杂食动物最慢。营养策略之间的转变速度也存在高度偏见:从食草动物向杂食动物和肉食动物的转变速度最快,而食草动物和肉食动物之间的转变速度最低。现存的食草动物和肉食动物多样性主要是通过谱系内的多样化而产生的,而杂食动物的多样性则是通过向该策略的转变而进化而来的。专门化和细分营养位的能力使食草动物和肉食动物比杂食动物进化出更大的多样性。