Katsuta Hospital Mito GammaHouse, Hitachi-naka, Japan.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Dec 1;84(5):1110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.040. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
We tested the validity of 3 recently proposed prognostic indexes for breast cancer patients with brain metastases (METs) treated radiosurgically. The 3 indexes are Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA), New Breast Cancer (NBC)-Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA), and our index, sub-classification of RPA class II patients into 3 sub-classes (RPA class II-a, II-b and II-c) based on Karnofsky performance status, tumor number, original tumor status, and non-brain METs.
This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study using our database of 269 consecutive female breast cancer patients (mean age, 55 years; range, 26-86 years) who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) alone, without whole-brain radiation therapy, for brain METs during the 15-year period between 1996 and 2011. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the absolute risk of each event.
Kaplan-Meier plots of our patient series showed statistically significant survival differences among patients stratified into 3, 4, or 5 groups based on the 3 systems (P<.001). However, the mean survival time (MST) differences between some pairs of groups failed to reach statistical significance with all 3 systems. Thus, we attempted to regrade our 269 breast cancer patients into 3 groups by modifying our aforementioned index along with the original RPA class I and III, (ie, RPA I+II-a, II-b, and II-c+III). There were statistically significant MST differences among these 3 groups without overlap of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between any 2 pairs of groups: 18.4 (95% CI = 14.0-29.5) months in I+II-a, 9.2 in II-b (95% CI = 6.8-12.9, P<.001 vs I+II-a) and 5.0 in II-c+III (95% CI = 4.2-6.8, P<.001 vs II-b).
As none of the new grading systems, DS-GPS, BC-RPA and our system, was applicable to our set of radiosurgically treated patients for comparing survivals after GKRS, we slightly modified our system for breast cancer patients.
我们测试了最近提出的 3 种用于治疗脑转移瘤(METs)的乳腺癌患者的预后指数的有效性。这 3 种指数分别是诊断特异性分级预后评估(DS-GPA)、新乳腺癌(NBC)-递归分区分析(RPA)和我们的指数,根据 Karnofsky 表现状态、肿瘤数量、原始肿瘤状态和非脑 MET 将 RPA Ⅱ类患者分为 3 个亚类(RPA Ⅱ-a、Ⅱ-b 和Ⅱ-c)。
这是一项机构审查委员会批准的回顾性队列研究,使用我们的数据库,该数据库包含 269 名连续的女性乳腺癌患者(平均年龄 55 岁;范围 26-86 岁),这些患者在 1996 年至 2011 年的 15 年期间接受了伽玛刀放射外科手术(GKRS)单独治疗,未接受全脑放疗,用于治疗脑 MET。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计每个事件的绝对风险。
我们的患者系列的 Kaplan-Meier 图显示,根据 3 种系统(P<.001),将患者分为 3、4 或 5 组时,生存差异具有统计学意义。然而,在使用所有 3 种系统时,一些组之间的平均生存时间(MST)差异未能达到统计学意义。因此,我们试图通过修改上述指数以及原始 RPA Ⅰ类和 Ⅲ类,将我们的 269 名乳腺癌患者重新分为 3 组(即 RPA I+II-a、II-b 和 II-c+III)。这些 3 组之间的 MST 差异具有统计学意义,并且任何 2 组之间的 95%置信区间(CI)没有重叠:I+II-a 组为 18.4(95%CI=14.0-29.5)个月,II-b 组为 9.2(95%CI=6.8-12.9,P<.001 与 I+II-a 相比),II-c+III 组为 5.0(95%CI=4.2-6.8,P<.001 与 II-b 相比)。
由于没有任何新的分级系统,即 DS-GPS、BC-RPA 和我们的系统,适用于我们接受 GKRS 治疗的患者,用于比较 GKRS 后生存率,因此我们对我们的系统进行了轻微修改,用于乳腺癌患者。