• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从事牙科工作的女性的儿子的认知功能。

Cognitive function among sons of women who worked in dentistry.

机构信息

Karolinska Institutet, Department of Dental Medicine, Box 4064, SE-141 04 Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012 Nov;38(6):546-52. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3279. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3279
PMID:22517488
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Exposure to elemental mercury vapor can impair neurological function as it is neurotoxic in doses higher than usually found in dentistry. Little is known about the potential effects of fetal exposure to elemental mercury among offspring of female dental workers. We investigated cognitive function among offspring of women working in dentistry at the time of their pregnancy.

METHODS

We compared results for cognitive function examinations taken by the majority of young men in Sweden at the time of compulsory military enlistment (age 17-18 years). Sons of female dentists (N=365) and dental nurses (N=3181) born during the 1960-1970s were compared with sons of female physicians (N=378) and assistant nurses (N=12 667).

RESULTS

Analysis by linear regression showed that sons of dental workers had similar or higher cognitive function test results compared to their matched cohorts.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of poorer cognitive function among male offspring of female dentists or dental nurses.

摘要

目的

元素汞蒸气的接触会损害神经系统功能,因为在高于通常在牙科中发现的剂量下,它具有神经毒性。关于女性牙科工作者的胎儿在接触元素汞方面的潜在影响,人们知之甚少。我们研究了在女性怀孕时从事牙科工作的女性的后代的认知功能。

方法

我们比较了瑞典在兵役登记时(17-18 岁)大多数年轻男性参加的认知功能检查的结果。出生于 20 世纪 60 年代至 70 年代的牙医(N=365)和牙科护士(N=3181)的儿子与女医生(N=378)和助理护士(N=12667)的儿子进行了比较。

结果

线性回归分析表明,与他们的匹配队列相比,牙科工作者的儿子具有相似或更高的认知功能测试结果。

结论

我们没有发现女性牙医或牙科护士的男性后代认知功能较差的证据。

相似文献

1
Cognitive function among sons of women who worked in dentistry.从事牙科工作的女性的儿子的认知功能。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012 Nov;38(6):546-52. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3279. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
2
Mortality among sons of female dental personnel--a national cohort study.女性牙科工作人员儿子的死亡率——一项全国队列研究。
J Perinat Med. 2014 Sep;42(5):655-61. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0270.
3
Neurological disease or intellectual disability among sons of female Swedish dental personnel.
J Perinat Med. 2016 May 1;44(4):453-60. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0294.
4
Hospital admissions for neurological and renal diseases among dentists and dental assistants occupationally exposed to mercury.职业性汞暴露的牙医和牙科助理的神经和肾脏疾病住院情况。
Occup Environ Med. 2011 Dec;68(12):895-901. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.064063. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
5
Comparison of hair, nails and urine for biological monitoring of low level inorganic mercury exposure in dental workers.头发、指甲和尿液用于牙科工作者低水平无机汞暴露生物监测的比较。
Biomarkers. 2004 Jan-Feb;9(1):47-55. doi: 10.1080/13547500410001670312.
6
Maternal blood glucose in diabetic pregnancies and cognitive performance in offspring in young adulthood: a Danish cohort study.糖尿病孕妇的母血葡萄糖水平与子女成年早期的认知表现:丹麦队列研究。
Diabet Med. 2010 Jul;27(7):786-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03024.x.
7
[Mercury impregnation in dentists and dental assistants in Monastir city, Tunisia].[突尼斯莫纳斯提尔市牙医和牙科助手体内的汞浸渍情况]
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2009 Jun;110(3):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.stomax.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 May 5.
8
Effect of occupational exposure to elemental mercury in the amalgam on thymulin hormone production among dental staff.牙科工作人员职业接触汞合金中元素汞对胸腺素激素产生的影响。
Toxicol Ind Health. 2009 Apr;25(3):159-67. doi: 10.1177/0748233709105270.
9
Maternal longevity and the sex of offspring in pre-industrial Sweden.工业化前瑞典的母亲寿命与子女性别
Ann Hum Biol. 2007 Sep-Oct;34(5):535-46. doi: 10.1080/03014460701517215.
10
Occupational exposure to mercury in dentistry and dentist mortality.牙科领域的职业汞暴露与牙医死亡率
J Can Dent Assoc. 1997 May;63(5):372-6.