Suppr超能文献

癌症患者的门诊经皮中心静脉置管

Outpatient percutaneous central venous access in cancer patients.

作者信息

Broadwater J R, Henderson M A, Bell J L, Edwards M J, Smith G J, McCready D R, Swanson R S, Hardy M E, Shenk R R, Lawson M

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1990 Dec;160(6):676-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80773-1.

Abstract

A 1-year experience of percutaneous subclavian catheterization in outpatients with cancer was reviewed to document reliability, safety, and cost. There were 763 catheter insertions attempted with prospective documentation of complications in 664 consecutive patients. Catheter insertion was successful in 722 attempts (95%). There were only 13 pneumothoraces (2%). Thirty catheters required repositioning (4%). The average catheter duration was 191 days (range: 0 to 892 days). Fifty-six catheters (8%) were removed because of suspected infection. Documented catheter sepsis occurred in 21 patients (3%); catheter site infection occurred in 8 patients (1%). Thus, only 0.22 infections per catheter year occurred during this 382 catheter-year experience. The estimated cost of catheter insertion was $562, which is one-third the estimated cost for tunneled catheters ($1,403) and for reservoir devices ($1,738). In our experience, percutaneous subclavian catheterization is a reliable, cost-effective method compared with tunneled or reservoir devices, with an equivalent incidence of catheter-related infections. The cornerstone of our success with this program is a staff dedicated to catheter care and intensive patient education. In centers where a large number of patients require central venous access, percutaneous catheterization should be the technique of choice.

摘要

回顾了癌症门诊患者经皮锁骨下置管1年的经验,以记录其可靠性、安全性和成本。对连续664例患者进行了763次置管尝试,并对并发症进行了前瞻性记录。722次尝试置管成功(95%)。仅发生13例气胸(2%)。30根导管需要重新定位(4%)。导管平均使用时间为191天(范围:0至892天)。56根导管(8%)因疑似感染而拔除。记录在案的导管败血症发生在21例患者中(3%);导管部位感染发生在8例患者中(1%)。因此,在这382导管-年的经验中,每年每根导管仅发生0.22例感染。置管估计费用为562美元,仅为隧道式导管(1403美元)和储液器装置(1738美元)估计费用的三分之一。根据我们的经验,与隧道式或储液器装置相比,经皮锁骨下置管是一种可靠、经济有效的方法,导管相关感染发生率相当。我们该项目成功的关键是有一支致力于导管护理和对患者进行强化教育的工作人员队伍。在大量患者需要中心静脉通路的中心,经皮置管应作为首选技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验