• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者的门诊经皮中心静脉置管

Outpatient percutaneous central venous access in cancer patients.

作者信息

Broadwater J R, Henderson M A, Bell J L, Edwards M J, Smith G J, McCready D R, Swanson R S, Hardy M E, Shenk R R, Lawson M

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1990 Dec;160(6):676-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80773-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80773-1
PMID:2252135
Abstract

A 1-year experience of percutaneous subclavian catheterization in outpatients with cancer was reviewed to document reliability, safety, and cost. There were 763 catheter insertions attempted with prospective documentation of complications in 664 consecutive patients. Catheter insertion was successful in 722 attempts (95%). There were only 13 pneumothoraces (2%). Thirty catheters required repositioning (4%). The average catheter duration was 191 days (range: 0 to 892 days). Fifty-six catheters (8%) were removed because of suspected infection. Documented catheter sepsis occurred in 21 patients (3%); catheter site infection occurred in 8 patients (1%). Thus, only 0.22 infections per catheter year occurred during this 382 catheter-year experience. The estimated cost of catheter insertion was $562, which is one-third the estimated cost for tunneled catheters ($1,403) and for reservoir devices ($1,738). In our experience, percutaneous subclavian catheterization is a reliable, cost-effective method compared with tunneled or reservoir devices, with an equivalent incidence of catheter-related infections. The cornerstone of our success with this program is a staff dedicated to catheter care and intensive patient education. In centers where a large number of patients require central venous access, percutaneous catheterization should be the technique of choice.

摘要

回顾了癌症门诊患者经皮锁骨下置管1年的经验,以记录其可靠性、安全性和成本。对连续664例患者进行了763次置管尝试,并对并发症进行了前瞻性记录。722次尝试置管成功(95%)。仅发生13例气胸(2%)。30根导管需要重新定位(4%)。导管平均使用时间为191天(范围:0至892天)。56根导管(8%)因疑似感染而拔除。记录在案的导管败血症发生在21例患者中(3%);导管部位感染发生在8例患者中(1%)。因此,在这382导管-年的经验中,每年每根导管仅发生0.22例感染。置管估计费用为562美元,仅为隧道式导管(1403美元)和储液器装置(1738美元)估计费用的三分之一。根据我们的经验,与隧道式或储液器装置相比,经皮锁骨下置管是一种可靠、经济有效的方法,导管相关感染发生率相当。我们该项目成功的关键是有一支致力于导管护理和对患者进行强化教育的工作人员队伍。在大量患者需要中心静脉通路的中心,经皮置管应作为首选技术。

相似文献

1
Outpatient percutaneous central venous access in cancer patients.癌症患者的门诊经皮中心静脉置管
Am J Surg. 1990 Dec;160(6):676-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80773-1.
2
Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.非隧道式硅橡胶导管感染率低且耐用性长。是长期静脉通路的一种安全且具成本效益的替代选择。
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Aug 9;153(15):1791-6.
3
Experience with long-term outpatient venous access utilizing percutaneously placed silicone elastomer catheters.经皮放置硅橡胶弹性体导管用于长期门诊静脉通路的经验。
Cancer. 1985 Oct 15;56(8):2074-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19851015)56:8<2074::aid-cncr2820560831>3.0.co;2-f.
4
A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients.对100例连续癌症患者采用头静脉切开法进行慢性留置中心静脉通路的前瞻性分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Aug;7(7):496-502. doi: 10.1007/s10434-000-0496-9.
5
Mediastinal approach to the placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in patients with central vein occlusion in an outpatient access center.在门诊血管通路中心,针对中心静脉闭塞患者采用纵隔入路放置带隧道的血液透析导管。
J Vasc Access. 2011 Jul-Sep;12(3):258-61. doi: 10.5301/JVA.2010.6084.
6
Long-term, tunneled, noncuffed central venous catheter in cancer patients (Vygon): safety, efficacy, and complications.癌症患者使用的长期、带隧道、无袖套中心静脉导管(Vygon):安全性、有效性及并发症
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Nov;14(11):1141-6. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0065-2. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
7
[Totally implantable central venous access devices in patients with cancer. Experience at a private oncology center].[癌症患者的完全植入式中心静脉通路装置。一家私立肿瘤中心的经验]
Cir Cir. 2012 Sep-Oct;80(5):429-34.
8
To reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections: is the subclavian route better than the jugular route for central venous catheterization?为减少导管相关血流感染:中心静脉置管时锁骨下途径是否优于颈内静脉途径?
J Infect Chemother. 2006 Dec;12(6):363-5. doi: 10.1007/s10156-006-0471-x. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
9
[Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].[长期中心静脉置管的置入与管理:放射成像技术的作用]
Radiol Med. 1998 Oct;96(4):369-74.
10
Placement of long-term central venous catheters in outpatients: study of 134 patients over 24,596 catheter days.门诊患者长期中心静脉导管的放置:对134例患者进行24596导管日的研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 May;168(5):1235-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129419.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.癌症患者化疗时经放射学引导植入中心静脉通路端口装置(CVAPD)的长期结局:机构经验及文献综述
Br J Cancer. 2004 Sep 13;91(6):1045-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602082.
2
Complications associated with different insertion techniques for Hickman catheters.与Hickman导管不同插入技术相关的并发症。
Postgrad Med J. 1998 Feb;74(868):104-7. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.74.868.104.
3
Administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Techniques and controversies.
化疗药物的给药。技术与争议。
Support Care Cancer. 1994 Nov;2(6):335-46. doi: 10.1007/BF00344046.