Global Collaboration Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
J Epidemiol. 2012;22(4):324-30. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20110147. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
Analysis of the effects of social gradients on women's health requires a suitable means of assessing social standing.
We compared social gradients in stroke risk among 9317 married Japanese women from the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study over a 16-year period. Social gradient was estimated by 3 methods of indicating social position: education level derived by using the individual approach (woman's own educational level), the conventional approach (using her partner's educational level), and the combined approach (combining the woman's and her partner's educational levels).
As compared with the lowest educational group, stroke risk was similar among women in the highest educational group using the individual approach and lower, but not significantly so, with the conventional approach. With the combined approach, however, the age- and area-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was significantly lower among the highest education group as compared with the lowest group (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.76), and the relative index of inequality was significant (RII = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.72). Using the combined approach, the results were similar irrespective of employment status. In the combined highest educational group, stroke risk among unemployed women was significantly reduced by 54%, while stroke risk for employed women was significantly reduced by 46%, as compared with the lowest educational group, with RIIs of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.85) and 0.49 (0.30, 0.80), respectively.
The results suggest that a combined approach better reflects social standing among married women in Japan.
分析社会阶层对女性健康的影响需要一种合适的方法来评估社会地位。
我们比较了日本公共卫生中心前瞻性研究中 9317 名已婚日本女性在 16 年内中风风险的社会梯度。通过 3 种方法来衡量社会地位:个人方法(女性自身的教育水平)表示的教育水平、传统方法(使用其伴侣的教育水平)和综合方法(结合女性及其伴侣的教育水平)。
与最低教育组相比,个体方法中最高教育组的中风风险相似,而传统方法中的风险则较低,但无统计学意义。然而,在综合方法中,与最低教育组相比,最高教育组的年龄和地区调整后的风险比(HR)显著降低(HR=0.52,95%CI:0.36,0.76),且不平等相对指数(RII)有统计学意义(RII=0.48,95%CI:0.32,0.72)。使用综合方法,结果与就业状况无关。在综合最高教育组中,与最低教育组相比,失业女性的中风风险显著降低 54%,而就业女性的中风风险显著降低 46%,RII 分别为 0.42(95%CI:0.21,0.85)和 0.49(95%CI:0.30,0.80)。
结果表明,综合方法更好地反映了日本已婚女性的社会地位。