Kasajima Megumi, Hashimoto Hideki
Department of Health and Social Behavior, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Nov 7;12:100692. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100692. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Persistent socioeconomic disparity in mortality is a widely observed phenomenon despite improvements in the economic standard of living and the prevailing universal healthcare coverage policy. In this study, we selected Japan as a case in which public universal coverage has maintained horizontal equity in healthcare access while demographic and economic challenges have affected the life chances of vulnerable subpopulations over the past decade. We assessed the changing trends in the education-related disparity in mortality over a decade across demographic subpopulations for different causes of death, with the goal of generating social policy lessons to contribute to closing the mortality gap. Using a deterministic data merge between nationwide census and death records, we estimated age- and sex-specific mortality rates for 14 causes and their education-related gradients with absolute and relative indices of inequality in 2000 and 2010 via Poisson regression. Estimation parameters were standardized to the age structure of the sub-population of high school graduates in 2000 as the reference. The results demonstrated that the relative gaps in all-cause mortality persisted despite a decrease in the average mortality rate over the study period. The absolute gaps in mortality increased for preventable causes of death associated with lifestyle behavior choices. The average mortality worsened among socioeconomically vulnerable populations such as youth and women, who were left behind in the existing social/economic policy. External causes of death such as suicide and traffic accidents showed decreasing absolute gaps in a subpopulation targeted by universal social and labor policy measures. These change patterns indicate that, compared with a high-risk approach, a universal policy approach to dealing with societal and fundamental causes of health inequality seems more effective in reducing the education-related mortality gap in both absolute and relative terms.
尽管生活经济水平有所提高且普遍实行了全民医保政策,但死亡率方面持续存在的社会经济差距仍是一个广泛存在的现象。在本研究中,我们选择日本作为案例,在过去十年中,尽管人口和经济挑战影响了弱势群体的生存机会,但全民医保在医疗服务可及性方面保持了横向公平。我们评估了不同死因的各人口亚群体在十年间与教育相关的死亡率差距变化趋势,目的是总结社会政策经验,以缩小死亡率差距。通过将全国人口普查数据与死亡记录进行确定性数据合并,我们通过泊松回归估计了2000年和2010年14种死因的年龄和性别特异性死亡率及其与教育相关的不平等绝对和相对指数梯度。估计参数以2000年高中毕业生亚群体的年龄结构为参照进行标准化。结果表明,尽管在研究期间平均死亡率有所下降,但全因死亡率的相对差距依然存在。与生活方式行为选择相关的可预防死因的死亡率绝对差距有所增加。在社会经济弱势群体(如年轻人和女性)中,平均死亡率恶化,这些群体被排除在现有社会/经济政策之外。自杀和交通事故等外部死因在受到普遍社会和劳动政策措施关注的亚群体中,绝对差距有所下降。这些变化模式表明,与针对高风险群体的方法相比,从社会和健康不平等根本原因出发的全民政策方法在缩小与教育相关的死亡率绝对和相对差距方面似乎更有效。