Suppr超能文献

在胸腰椎骨折的治疗中保留一个腰椎节段是否可行?

Is it possible to save one lumbar segment in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures?

作者信息

Ugras Ali Akin, Akyildiz Mustafa Fehmi, Yilmaz Murat, Sungur Ibrahim, Cetinus Ercan

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics of Haseki Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2012 Feb;78(1):87-93.

Abstract

Surgical treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures is controversial. Most authors reported that short segment fixation led to a high incidence of implant failure and correction loss. On the other hand, long segment fixation has the disadvantage of fusing more segments. We aimed to compare the outcomes of long-segment fixation versus two or three levels above and one level below fixation for acute thoracolumbar fractures. Twenty six consecutive patients were assigned to two groups. Group 1 included 14 patients treated with long fixation, whereas group 2 included 12 patients treated with two or three levels above and one level below fixation. Fractures were classified according to the Mc Cormack, Magerl and Denis classifications. Clinical (Oswestry questionnaire, Visual analog score) and radiological (Sagittal index, percentage of anterior body height compression, local kyphosis and Cobb angle) outcomes were analysed. The average follow-up for the long and hybrid fixation groups were 28 and 20 months respectively. Clinical scores of both groups at the last follow-up were not significantly different. The preoperative, postoperative and follow-up sagittal index, anterior body height compression, local kyphosis angle and Cobb angle were not significantly different. Correction loss of 3.36 degrees was seen in the long segment fixation group, versus 2.75 degrees in the other group at the last follow-up. There was no significant difference between the results achieved in the patients who had transpedicular fixation two or three levels above and one level below the fractured vertebra and those who had long segment fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures.

摘要

不稳定型胸腰椎骨折的手术治疗存在争议。大多数作者报告称,短节段固定导致内植物失败和矫正丢失的发生率较高。另一方面,长节段固定的缺点是融合节段更多。我们旨在比较长节段固定与骨折椎体上方两到三个节段及下方一个节段固定治疗急性胸腰椎骨折的疗效。连续26例患者被分为两组。第1组包括14例行长节段固定治疗的患者,而第2组包括12例行骨折椎体上方两到三个节段及下方一个节段固定治疗的患者。骨折根据McCormack、Magerl和Denis分类法进行分类。分析临床(Oswestry问卷、视觉模拟评分)和影像学(矢状面指数、椎体前缘高度压缩百分比、局部后凸和Cobb角)结果。长节段固定组和混合固定组的平均随访时间分别为28个月和20个月。两组在末次随访时的临床评分无显著差异。术前、术后及随访时的矢状面指数、椎体前缘高度压缩、局部后凸角和Cobb角无显著差异。在末次随访时,长节段固定组的矫正丢失为3.36度,另一组为2.75度。对于胸腰椎爆裂骨折,在骨折椎体上方两到三个节段及下方一个节段行经椎弓根固定的患者与行长节段固定的患者所取得的结果之间无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验