Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Kentucky Clinic L-445, 740 S. Limestone Street, Lexington, KY, 40536-0284, USA.
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2012 Jun;14(3):241-55. doi: 10.1007/s11940-012-0172-y.
The first critical step in the appropriate treatment of neurological infectious disease accompanying immunosuppressive states or immunomodulatory medication is to properly identify the offending organism. Broadly immunosuppressive conditions will predispose to both common and uncommon infectious diseases. There are substantial differences between neurological infectious disorders complicating disturbances of the innate immunity (neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages) and those due to abnormal adaptive immunity (humoral and cellular immunity). Similarly, there are differences in the types of infections with impaired humoral immunity compared to disturbed cellular immunity and between T- and B-cell disorders. HIV/AIDS has been a model of acquired immunosuppression and the nature of opportunistic infections with which it has been associated has been well characterized and generally correlates well with the degree of CD4 lymphopenia. Increasingly, immunotherapies target specific components of the immune system, such as an adhesion molecule or its ligand or surface receptors on a special class of cells. These targeted perturbations of the immune system increase the risk of particular infectious diseases. For instance, natalizumab, an α4β1 integrin inhibitor that is highly effective in multiple sclerosis, increases the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy for reasons that still remain unclear. It is likely that other therapies that result in a disruption of a specific component of the immune system will be associated with other unique opportunistic infections. The risk of multiple simultaneous neurological infections in the immunosuppressed host must always be considered, particularly with a failure to respond to a therapeutic regimen. With respect to appropriate and effective therapy, diagnostic accuracy assumes primacy, but occasionally broad spectrum therapy is necessitated. For a number of opportunistic infectious disorders, particularly some viral and fungal diseases, antimicrobial therapy remains inadequate.
在治疗伴有免疫抑制状态或免疫调节药物的神经感染性疾病时,首要的关键步骤是正确识别致病病原体。广泛的免疫抑制状态会使常见和罕见的传染病都更容易发生。干扰固有免疫(中性粒细胞、单核细胞和巨噬细胞)的神经感染性疾病与异常适应性免疫(体液和细胞免疫)相关的疾病有很大的不同。同样,在与细胞免疫紊乱相比,在与体液免疫受损相关的感染类型、在 T 细胞和 B 细胞疾病之间也存在差异。艾滋病毒/艾滋病是获得性免疫抑制的模型,与它相关的机会性感染的性质已经得到了很好的描述,并且通常与 CD4 淋巴细胞减少的程度很好地相关。越来越多的免疫疗法针对免疫系统的特定成分,例如粘附分子或其配体或特殊细胞类别的表面受体。这些对免疫系统的靶向干扰会增加特定传染病的风险。例如,阿仑单抗,一种α4β1 整合素抑制剂,在多发性硬化症中非常有效,但由于原因仍不清楚,会增加进行性多灶性白质脑病的风险。其他可能导致免疫系统特定成分中断的治疗方法也可能与其他独特的机会性感染有关。免疫抑制宿主中同时发生多种神经感染的风险必须始终考虑,特别是在治疗方案无效的情况下。关于适当和有效的治疗,诊断准确性至关重要,但偶尔也需要广谱治疗。对于一些机会性感染性疾病,特别是一些病毒和真菌疾病,抗菌治疗仍然不足。