• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用预视范式研究空间忽视中的视觉搜索。

Visual search in spatial neglect studied with a preview paradigm.

作者信息

Fellrath Julia, Blanche-Durbec Vanessa, Schnider Armin, Jacquemoud Anne-Sophie, Ptak Radek

机构信息

Division of Neurorehabilitation, University Hospitals Geneva Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 18;6:93. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00093. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00093
PMID:22529795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3328796/
Abstract

Impaired visual search is a hallmark of spatial neglect. When searching for an unique feature (e.g., color) neglect patients often show only slight visual field asymmetries. In contrast, when the target is defined by a combination of features (e.g., color and form) they exhibit a severe deficit of contralesional search. This finding suggests a selective impairment of the serial deployment of spatial attention. Here, we examined this deficit with a preview paradigm. Neglect patients searched for a target defined by the conjunction of shape and color, presented together with varying numbers of distracters. The presentation time was varied such that on some trials participants previewed the target together with same-shape/different-color distracters, for 300 or 600 ms prior to the appearance of additional different-shape/same-color distracters. On the remaining trials the target and all distracters were shown simultaneously. Healthy participants exhibited a serial search strategy only when all items were presented simultaneously, whereas in both preview conditions a pop-out effect was observed. Neglect patients showed a similar pattern when the target was presented in the right hemifield. In contrast, when searching for a target in the left hemifield they showed serial search in the no-preview condition, as well as with a preview of 300 ms, and partly even at 600 ms. A control experiment suggested that the failure to fully benefit from item preview was probably independent of accurate perception of time. Our results, when viewed in the context of existing literature, lead us to conclude that the visual search deficit in neglect reflects two additive factors: a biased representation of attentional priority in favor of ipsilesional information and exaggerated capture of attention by ipsilesional abrupt onsets.

摘要

视觉搜索受损是空间忽视的一个标志。在搜索独特特征(如颜色)时,忽视患者通常仅表现出轻微的视野不对称。相比之下,当目标由多种特征组合定义(如颜色和形状)时,他们在对侧视野搜索中表现出严重缺陷。这一发现表明空间注意的序列部署存在选择性损伤。在此,我们用一种预览范式研究了这一缺陷。忽视患者搜索由形状和颜色组合定义的目标,同时呈现不同数量的干扰项。呈现时间有所变化,在某些试验中,参与者在出现其他不同形状/相同颜色的干扰项之前,先与相同形状/不同颜色的干扰项一起预览目标300或600毫秒。在其余试验中,目标和所有干扰项同时呈现。健康参与者仅在所有项目同时呈现时才表现出序列搜索策略,而在两种预览条件下均观察到弹出效应。当目标出现在右半视野时,忽视患者表现出类似模式。相比之下,当在左半视野搜索目标时他们在无预览条件下以及300毫秒预览时表现出序列搜索,甚至在600毫秒预览时部分也是如此。一项对照实验表明,未能充分从项目预览中获益可能与对时间的准确感知无关。结合现有文献来看,我们的结果使我们得出结论,忽视中的视觉搜索缺陷反映了两个相加因素:注意力优先级偏向患侧信息的表征,以及患侧突然出现的刺激对注意力的过度吸引。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c527/3328796/121d92c22eed/fnhum-06-00093-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c527/3328796/a76e3d0ecd59/fnhum-06-00093-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c527/3328796/5207bd75cbb2/fnhum-06-00093-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c527/3328796/c7384cb59453/fnhum-06-00093-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c527/3328796/121d92c22eed/fnhum-06-00093-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c527/3328796/a76e3d0ecd59/fnhum-06-00093-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c527/3328796/5207bd75cbb2/fnhum-06-00093-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c527/3328796/c7384cb59453/fnhum-06-00093-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c527/3328796/121d92c22eed/fnhum-06-00093-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Visual search in spatial neglect studied with a preview paradigm.采用预视范式研究空间忽视中的视觉搜索。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 18;6:93. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00093. eCollection 2012.
2
Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.时间和空间上的跨模态交互:听觉对半侧空间忽视中视觉注意的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Aug;18(8):1368-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1368.
3
The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.颞下回介导了空间忽视患者对干扰物具有抗性的视觉搜索。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 May;17(5):788-99. doi: 10.1162/0898929053747676.
4
Ipsilesional deficit of selective attention in left homonymous hemianopia and left unilateral spatial neglect.左侧同向性偏盲和左侧单侧空间忽略患者的选择性注意偏向健侧。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 May;128:305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.无预览益处的起始优势:区分搜索中起始效应和预览效应的神经心理学证据
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):110-20. doi: 10.1162/089892906775250076.
6
The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.单特征与联合搜索中的预览效益:视觉标记的限制
J Vis. 2015;15(13):13. doi: 10.1167/15.13.13.
7
A non-spatial bias favouring fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect.在空间忽视患者中发现一种有利于注视刺激的非空间偏向。
Brain. 2007 Dec;130(Pt 12):3211-22. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm234. Epub 2007 Sep 28.
8
Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.基于颜色和预览的子集选择性搜索。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):85-99. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1211-7.
9
A psychophysical investigation into the preview benefit in visual search.一项关于视觉搜索中预览益处的心理物理学研究。
Vision Res. 2007 Mar;47(6):735-45. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.007. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
10
Modulation of the directional attention deficit in visual neglect by hemispatial factors.半空间因素对视觉忽视中定向注意缺陷的调节作用。
Brain Cogn. 1993 Jul;22(2):148-60. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1993.1030.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Eye Tracking Metrics and Cognitive Function in Post-Stroke Individuals: A Comparison of Visual Searching Tasks between Those with and without Cognitive Impairment.研究中风后个体的眼动追踪指标与认知功能:有认知障碍和无认知障碍个体视觉搜索任务的比较。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024;53(6):683-692. doi: 10.1159/000535756. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
2
Early Visual Processing of Feature Saliency Tasks: A Review of Psychophysical Experiments.特征显著性任务的早期视觉处理:心理物理学实验综述
Front Syst Neurosci. 2018 Oct 26;12:54. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2018.00054. eCollection 2018.
3
Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect.

本文引用的文献

1
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.引导搜索 2.0:一种改进的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774.
2
Preattentive processes guide visual search: evidence from patients with unilateral visual neglect.前注意过程指导视觉搜索:来自单侧视觉忽视患者的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Summer;5(3):288-302. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.3.288.
3
Visual search performance in the neglect syndrome.忽视综合征的视觉搜索表现。
忽视的空间与非空间方面。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Feb 5;7:25. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00025. eCollection 2013.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1989 Fall;1(4):372-85. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.4.372.
4
Cortical control of inhibition of return: evidence from patients with inferior parietal damage and visual neglect.顶叶对返回抑制的控制:来自下顶叶损伤和视觉忽视患者的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Apr;50(5):800-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
5
Spatial attention deficits in humans: the critical role of superior compared to inferior parietal lesions.人类空间注意力缺陷:与顶叶下损伤相比,顶叶上损伤的关键作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 May;50(6):1092-103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
6
The neural correlates of object-centered processing in reading: a lesion study of neglect dyslexia.阅读中以物体为中心的加工的神经关联:忽视性阅读障碍的病变研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 May;50(6):1142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.036. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
7
The attention network of the human brain: relating structural damage associated with spatial neglect to functional imaging correlates of spatial attention.人类大脑的注意网络:将与空间忽视相关的结构损伤与空间注意的功能成像相关物联系起来。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Sep;49(11):3063-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
8
Absence of visual feedback abolishes expression of hemispatial neglect in self-guided spatial completion.缺乏视觉反馈会消除自我引导的空间完成中偏侧空间忽略的表达。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;82(11):1279-82. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300656. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
9
The frontoparietal attention network of the human brain: action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment.人类大脑的额顶注意网络:作用、突显以及环境的优先级图。
Neuroscientist. 2012 Oct;18(5):502-15. doi: 10.1177/1073858411409051. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
10
A behavioral analysis of spatial neglect and its recovery after stroke.中风后空间忽视及其恢复的行为分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Apr 4;5:29. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00029. eCollection 2011.