Suppr超能文献

麻醉信息管理系统评估的血液和血液成分利用的变异性。

Variability in blood and blood component utilization as assessed by an anesthesia information management system.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2012 Jul;117(1):99-106. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318255e550.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data can be collected for various purposes with anesthesia information management systems. The authors describe methods for using data acquired from an anesthesia information management system to assess intraoperative utilization of blood and blood components.

METHODS

Over an 18-month period, data were collected on 48,086 surgical patients at a tertiary care academic medical center. All data were acquired with an automated anesthesia recordkeeping system. Detailed reports were generated for blood and blood component utilization according to surgical service and surgical procedure, and for individual surgeons and anesthesiologists. Transfusion hemoglobin trigger and target concentrations were compared among surgical services and procedures, and between individual medical providers.

RESULTS

For all patients given erythrocytes, the mean transfusion hemoglobin trigger was 8.4 ± 1.5, and the target was 10.2 ± 1.5 g/dl. Variation was significant among surgical services (trigger range: 7.5 ± 1.2-9.5 ± 1.1, P = 0.0001; target range: 9.1 ± 1.2-11.3 ± 1.4 g/dl, P = 0.002), surgeons (trigger range: 7.2 ± 0.7-9.8 ± 1.0, P = 0.001; target range: 8.8 ± 0.9-11.8 ± 1.3 g/dl, P = 0.001), and anesthesiologists (trigger range: 7.2 ± 0.8-9.6 ± 1.2, P = 0.001; target range: 9.0 ± 0.9-11.7 ± 1.3 g/dl, P = 0.0004). The use of erythrocyte salvage, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets varied threefold to fourfold among individual surgeons compared with their peers performing the same surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of data acquired from an anesthesia information management system allowed a detailed analysis of blood component utilization, which revealed significant variation among surgical services and surgical procedures, and among individual anesthesiologists and surgeons compared with their peers. Incorporating these methods of data acquisition and analysis into a blood management program could reduce unnecessary transfusions, an outcome that may increase patient safety and reduce costs.

摘要

背景

麻醉信息管理系统可以用于收集各种目的的数据。作者描述了使用从麻醉信息管理系统中获取的数据评估术中血液和血液成分使用的方法。

方法

在 18 个月期间,在一家三级保健学术医疗中心对 48086 例手术患者进行了数据收集。所有数据均采用自动化麻醉记录系统采集。根据手术服务和手术程序、外科医生和麻醉医生个体生成详细的血液和血液成分使用报告。比较了手术服务和程序之间以及各个医疗提供者之间的输血血红蛋白触发值和目标浓度。

结果

对于所有输注红细胞的患者,平均输血血红蛋白触发值为 8.4 ± 1.5g/dl,目标值为 10.2 ± 1.5g/dl。手术服务之间存在显著差异(触发值范围:7.5 ± 1.2-9.5 ± 1.1,P = 0.0001;目标值范围:9.1 ± 1.2-11.3 ± 1.4g/dl,P = 0.002)、外科医生(触发值范围:7.2 ± 0.7-9.8 ± 1.0,P = 0.001;目标值范围:8.8 ± 0.9-11.8 ± 1.3g/dl,P = 0.001)和麻醉医生(触发值范围:7.2 ± 0.8-9.6 ± 1.2,P = 0.001;目标值范围:9.0 ± 0.9-11.7 ± 1.3g/dl,P = 0.0004)。与执行相同手术程序的同行相比,个别外科医生的红细胞回收、新鲜冰冻血浆和血小板的使用差异高达三倍至四倍。

结论

使用从麻醉信息管理系统中获取的数据可以对血液成分的使用进行详细分析,结果显示手术服务和手术程序之间以及与同行相比,个别麻醉医生和外科医生之间存在显著差异。将这些数据采集和分析方法纳入血液管理计划可能会减少不必要的输血,从而提高患者安全性并降低成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验