Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 1;37(17):E1030-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825a676e.
A paired biomechanical study of pedicle screws augmented with bone cement in a human cadaveric and osteoporotic lumbar spine model. OBJECTIVES.: To evaluate immediate strength and stiffness of pedicle screw fixation augmented with a novel bioactive bone cement in an osteoporotic spine model and compare it with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement.
A novel bioactive bone cement, containing nanoscale particles of strontium and hydroxyapatite (Sr-HA), can promote new bone formation and osteointegration and provides a promising reinforcement to the osteoporotic spine. Its immediate mechanical performance in augmenting pedicle screw fixation has not been evaluated.
Two pedicle screws augmented with Sr-HA and PMMA cement were applied to each of 10 isolated cadaveric L3 vertebrae. Each screw was subjected to a toggling test and screw kinematics were calculated. The pedicle screw was subjected to a pullout test until failure. Finally, the screw coverage with cement was measured on computed tomographic images.
Screw translations in the toggling test were consistently larger in the Sr-HA group than in the PMMA group (1.4 ± 1.2 mm vs. 1.0 ± 1.1 mm at 1000 cycles). The rotation center was located closer to the screw tip in the Sr-HA group (19% of screw length) than in the PMMA group (37%). The only kinematic difference between Sr-HA and PMMA cements was the screw rotation at 1000 cycles (1.5° ± 0.9° vs. 1.3° ± 0.6°; P = 0.0026). All motion parameters increased significantly with more loading cycles. The pullout force was higher in the PMMA group than the Sr-HA group (1.40 ± 0.63 kN vs. 0.93 ± 0.70 kN), and this difference was marginally significant (P = 0.051). Sr-HA cement covered more of the screw length than PMMA cement (79 ± 19% vs. 43 ± 19%) (P = 0.036).
This paired-design study identified some subtle but mostly nonsignificant differences in immediate biomechanical fixation of pedicle screws augmented with the Sr-HA cement compared with the PMMA cement.
在人体尸体和骨质疏松腰椎模型中,对带有骨水泥的椎弓根螺钉进行配对生物力学研究。目的:评估新型生物活性骨水泥增强骨质疏松脊柱模型中椎弓根螺钉固定的即刻强度和刚度,并与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)水泥进行比较。
一种新型生物活性骨水泥,含有纳米级锶和羟基磷灰石(Sr-HA)颗粒,可促进新骨形成和骨整合,并为骨质疏松脊柱提供有前途的增强。它在增强椎弓根螺钉固定方面的即时机械性能尚未得到评估。
将 Sr-HA 和 PMMA 水泥分别应用于 10 个离体尸体 L3 椎体的每个椎弓根螺钉。每个螺钉都进行了摆动试验,并计算了螺钉运动学。将椎弓根螺钉进行拔出试验,直到失效。最后,在 CT 图像上测量螺钉与水泥的覆盖范围。
在摆动试验中,Sr-HA 组的螺钉位移始终大于 PMMA 组(1000 次循环时为 1.4 ± 1.2mm 对 1.0 ± 1.1mm)。旋转中心在 Sr-HA 组中更靠近螺钉尖端(螺钉长度的 19%),而在 PMMA 组中更靠近螺钉尖端(37%)。Sr-HA 和 PMMA 水泥之间唯一的运动学差异是在 1000 次循环时的螺钉旋转(1.5°±0.9°对 1.3°±0.6°;P=0.0026)。所有运动参数随着加载循环次数的增加而显著增加。PMMA 组的拔出力高于 Sr-HA 组(1.40±0.63kN 对 0.93±0.70kN),差异具有边际显著性(P=0.051)。Sr-HA 水泥覆盖的螺钉长度多于 PMMA 水泥(79%±19%对 43%±19%)(P=0.036)。
这项配对设计研究发现,与 PMMA 水泥相比,Sr-HA 水泥增强的椎弓根螺钉即刻生物力学固定存在一些细微但大多无统计学意义的差异。