• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猴子能够为未来的交换做计划吗?

Are monkeys able to plan for future exchange?

机构信息

Département Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2012 Sep;15(5):783-95. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0502-1. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-012-0502-1
PMID:22532073
Abstract

Whether or not non-human animals can plan for the future is a hotly debated issue. We investigate this question further and use a planning-to-exchange task to study future planning in the cooperative domain in two species of monkeys: the brown capuchin (Cebus apella) and the Tonkean macaque (Macaca tonkeana). The rationale required subjects to plan for a future opportunity to exchange tokens for food by collecting tokens several minutes in advance. Subjects who successfully planned for the exchange task were expected to select suitable tokens during a collection period (5/10 min), save them for a fixed period of time (20/30 min), then take them into an adjacent compartment and exchange them for food with an experimenter. Monkeys mostly failed to transport tokens when entering the testing compartment; hence, they do not seem able to plan for a future exchange with a human partner. Three subjects did however manage to solve the task several times, albeit at very low rates. They brought the correct version of three possible token types, but rarely transported more than one suitable token at a time. Given that the frequency of token manipulation predicted transport, success might have occurred by chance. This was not the case, however, since in most cases subjects were not already holding the token in their hands before they entered the testing compartment. Instead, these results may reflect subjects' strengths and weaknesses in their time-related comprehension of the task.

摘要

非人类动物是否能够规划未来是一个备受争议的问题。我们进一步研究了这个问题,并使用一个计划交换任务来研究两种猴子(卷尾猴和东加长尾猕猴)在合作领域的未来规划。该任务要求被试者提前几分钟收集代币,以规划未来的代币交换食物的机会。成功完成交换任务的被试者预计会在收集期(5/10 分钟)选择合适的代币,将其保存固定的时间段(20/30 分钟),然后将代币带入相邻的隔间,与实验者交换食物。猴子在进入测试隔间时大多无法运输代币;因此,它们似乎无法计划与人类伙伴进行未来的交换。然而,有 3 只猴子确实成功地解决了这个任务几次,尽管成功率非常低。它们带来了三种可能代币类型中的正确版本,但很少一次运输超过一个合适的代币。由于代币操作的频率预测了运输的成功,因此这种成功可能是偶然的。然而,事实并非如此,因为在大多数情况下,猴子在进入测试隔间之前手中并没有拿着代币。相反,这些结果可能反映了被试者在时间相关的任务理解方面的优势和劣势。

相似文献

1
Are monkeys able to plan for future exchange?猴子能够为未来的交换做计划吗?
Anim Cogn. 2012 Sep;15(5):783-95. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0502-1. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
2
Monkeys fail to reciprocate in an exchange task.猴子在交换任务中无法互惠。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):745-51. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0325-x. Epub 2010 May 16.
3
A concept of value during experimental exchange in brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella.棕色卷尾猴(僧帽卷尾猴)实验性交换过程中的价值概念。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2004 Sep-Oct;75(5):317-30. doi: 10.1159/000080209.
4
Token mediated tool exchange between tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)之间基于代币的工具交换
Anim Cogn. 2007 Oct;10(4):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0072-9. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
5
Bonobos and orangutans, but not chimpanzees, flexibly plan for the future in a token-exchange task.倭黑猩猩和猩猩(而非黑猩猩)能在代币交换任务中灵活地为未来做计划。
Anim Cogn. 2014 Nov;17(6):1329-40. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0768-6. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
6
Delaying gratification for food and tokens in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): when quantity is salient, symbolic stimuli do not improve performance.延迟满足对卷尾猴(Cebus apella)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的食物和代币的影响:当数量显著时,符号刺激并不能提高表现。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):539-48. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0482-1. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
7
Socially learned preferences for differentially rewarded tokens in the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).棕色卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)对不同奖励代币的社会学习偏好。
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Jun;118(2):133-9. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.133.
8
Evidence that monkeys (Macaca tonkeana and Sapajus apella) read moves, but no evidence that they read goals.有证据表明猴子(黑冠猕猴和卷尾猴)能读懂动作,但没有证据表明它们能读懂目标。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 Aug;129(3):304-10. doi: 10.1037/a0039294. Epub 2015 May 25.
9
Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对食物和代币数量的辨别
Anim Cogn. 2008 Apr;11(2):275-82. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0111-6. Epub 2007 Sep 28.
10
Can monkeys make investments based on maximized pay-off?猴子能根据收益最大化做出投资决策吗?
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 10;6(3):e17801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017801.

引用本文的文献

1
A short natural history of mental time travels: a journey still travelled?心理时间旅行的短暂自然史:一段仍在进行的旅程?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230402. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0402. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Intrinsic anticipatory motives in non-human primate food consumption behavior.非人灵长类动物食物消费行为中的内在预期动机。
iScience. 2024 Mar 8;27(4):109459. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109459. eCollection 2024 Apr 19.
3
Studying the Tonkean macaques of Strasbourg, a tale full of sound and fury.
斯特拉斯堡的汤氏长尾猴研究,一部充满喧嚣与愤怒的故事。
Primates. 2023 Nov;64(6):559-572. doi: 10.1007/s10329-023-01088-3. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
4
Editorial: Temporal Cognition: Its Development, Neurocognitive Basis, Relationships to Other Cognitive Domains, and Uniquely Human Aspects.社论:时间认知:其发展、神经认知基础、与其他认知领域的关系以及人类独有的方面。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 13;10:1865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01865. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparing physical and social cognitive skills in macaque species with different degrees of social tolerance.比较具有不同社会容忍度的猕猴物种的身体和社会认知技能。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 13;284(1862). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2738.
6
Primate cognition: attention, episodic memory, prospective memory, self-control, and metacognition as examples of cognitive control in nonhuman primates.灵长类动物认知:以注意力、情景记忆、前瞻记忆、自我控制和元认知为例探讨非人类灵长类动物的认知控制
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;7(5):294-316. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1397. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
7
The execution of planned detours by spider-eating predators.食蛛性捕食者执行计划好的迂回行动。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jan;105(1):194-210. doi: 10.1002/jeab.189.
8
Trading up: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-control through their exchange behavior.升级:黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)通过其交换行为展现出自我控制能力。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Jan;19(1):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0916-7. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
9
A spoon full of studies helps the comparison go down: a comparative analysis of Tulving's spoon test.一勺研究有助于比较下咽:图尔文勺子测试的比较分析。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 12;5:893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00893. eCollection 2014.
10
The evolution of self-control.自我控制的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):E2140-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323533111. Epub 2014 Apr 21.