David B E, Weitzman G A, Hervé C, Fellous M
Laboratoire d'éthique médicale et de médecine légale, Université Paris Descartes, France.
J Genet Couns. 2012 Oct;21(5):625-30. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9502-1. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
Orthodox Jewish patients who seek genetic counseling are often placed in a difficult position of having to choose between their desire to follow Jewish religious instruction (halacha) and following the advice of the genetic counselor. In this article we will present the work of the Puah Institute based in Jerusalem that is dedicated to assisting and guiding such couples to navigate through the medical system and medical recommendations and create a harmony between modern genetic counseling and the Orthodox Jewish tradition. In light of the expanding use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for a variety of medical and non-medical conditions, this dilemma is even more poignant. There is an ethical debate regarding PGD and the correct parameters for its use. Here we present the Orthodox Jewish view of the use and abuse of PGD. We present three case studies that sought the assistance and guidance of the Puah Institute. Each of these cases raises ethical dilemmas for the genetic counselor and for the rabbinic counselor. We discuss; the status of the embryo, the status of a carrier of a genetic abnormality and whether PGD is an obligation or good practice. In addition we deal with whether PGD and the search for the desired traits can be defined as eugenics or not.
寻求遗传咨询的东正教犹太患者常常陷入两难境地,不得不在遵循犹太宗教教义(哈拉卡)的愿望与听从遗传咨询师建议之间做出选择。在本文中,我们将介绍耶路撒冷普阿研究所的工作,该研究所致力于协助和指导此类夫妇在医疗系统及医疗建议中找到方向,并在现代遗传咨询与东正教犹太传统之间达成和谐。鉴于植入前基因诊断(PGD)在各种医疗和非医疗状况下的使用日益广泛,这一困境愈发尖锐。关于PGD及其正确使用参数存在一场伦理辩论。在此,我们呈现东正教犹太教对于PGD使用与滥用的观点。我们展示三个寻求普阿研究所协助与指导的案例研究。这些案例中的每一个都给遗传咨询师和拉比咨询师带来了伦理困境。我们讨论胚胎的地位、基因异常携带者的地位,以及PGD是一种义务还是良好做法。此外,我们探讨PGD以及对理想性状的筛选是否可被定义为优生学。