Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA.
Anat Sci Educ. 2012 Jul-Aug;5(4):187-99. doi: 10.1002/ase.1281. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
The evolution in undergraduate medical school curricula has significantly impacted anatomy education. This study investigated the perceived role of clinical anatomy and evaluated perceptions of medical students' ability to apply anatomical knowledge in the clinic. The aim of this study was to develop a framework to enhance anatomical educational initiatives. Unlike previous work, multiple stakeholders (clinicians, medical students, and academic anatomists) in anatomy education were evaluated. Participants completed an eleven-point Likert scale survey written by the investigators. Responses from both clinical educators and medical students at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and College of Medicine suggest that medical students are perceived as ill-prepared to transfer anatomy to the clinic. Although some areas of patient management differ in relevancy to anatomical education, there are areas of clinical care which were uniformly ranked as relying heavily on anatomical knowledge (imaging and diagnostic studies, physical examination, and arrival at correct diagnosis) by a variety of clinical specialists. Our results suggest a need for advanced anatomy courses to be taught coincidental with medical students' clinical education. Development of these courses would optimally rely on input from both clinicians and academic anatomists, as both cohorts rated clinical anatomy similarly (P ≥ 0.05). Additionally, we hypothesize that preclinical students' application of anatomy would be enhanced if clinical context was derived from areas of clinical care which rely heavily on anatomy, whereas courses designed for advanced medical students will benefit from anatomical context focused on specialty specific aspects of clinical care identified in this study.
本科医学院校课程的演变对解剖学教育产生了重大影响。本研究调查了临床解剖学的作用,并评估了医学生在临床中应用解剖学知识的能力。本研究旨在建立一个框架,以加强解剖学教育计划。与以往的工作不同,本研究评估了解剖学教育中的多个利益相关者(临床医生、医学生和学术解剖学家)。参与者完成了由研究人员编写的 11 点李克特量表调查。来自宾夕法尼亚州立大学米尔顿·S·赫尔希医疗中心和医学院的临床教育者和医学生的回应表明,医学生被认为准备不足,无法将解剖学知识转移到临床实践中。尽管患者管理的某些领域与解剖学教育的相关性不同,但在临床护理中,有一些领域被各种临床专家一致认为严重依赖解剖学知识(影像学和诊断研究、体格检查和正确诊断)。我们的结果表明,需要在医学生的临床教育中同时教授高级解剖学课程。这些课程的开发最理想的是依赖临床医生和学术解剖学家的投入,因为这两个群体对临床解剖学的评价相似(P≥0.05)。此外,我们假设,如果临床背景来自于严重依赖解剖学的临床护理领域,那么临床前学生对解剖学的应用将会得到提高,而针对高级医学生的课程则将受益于本研究中确定的、针对临床护理特定专业方面的解剖学背景。