Center for Population Health Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Hum Resour Health. 2012 Apr 25;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-10-6.
In Mexico 87% of births are attended by physicians. However, the decline in the national maternal mortality rate has been slower than expected. The Mexican Ministry of Health's 2009 strategy to reduce maternal mortality gives a role to two non-physician models that meet criteria for skilled attendants: obstetric nurses and professional midwives. This study compares and contrasts these two provider types with the medical model, analyzing perspectives on their respective training, scope of practice, and also their perception and/or experiences with integration into the public system as skilled birth attendants.
This paper synthesizes qualitative research that was obtained as a component of the quantitative and qualitative study that evaluated three models of obstetric care: professional midwives (PM), obstetric nurses (ON) and general physicians (GP). A total of 27 individual interviews using a semi-structured guide were carried out with PMs, ONs, GPs and specialists. Interviews were transcribed following the principles of grounded theory, codes and categories were created as they emerged from the data. We analyzed data in ATLAS.ti.
All provider types interviewed expressed confidence in their professional training and acknowledge that both professional midwives and obstetric nurses have the necessary skills and knowledge to care for women during normal pregnancy and childbirth. The three types of providers recognize limits to their practice, namely in the area of managing complications.We found differences in how each type of practitioner perceived the concept and process of birth and their role in this process. The barriers to incorporation as a model to attend birth faced by PMs and ONs are at the individual, hospital and system level. GPs question their ability and training to handle deliveries, in particular those that become complicated, and the professional midwifery model particularly as it relates to a clinical setting, is also questioned.
Hospitals in the Mexican public health sector have a heavy obstetric workload; physicians carry the additional burden of non-obstetric cases. The incorporation of a non- physician model at the primary health center level to attend low-risk, normal deliveries would contribute to the reduction of non-necessary referrals. There is also a role for these providers at the hospital level.
在墨西哥,87%的分娩由医生接生。然而,全国产妇死亡率的下降速度低于预期。墨西哥卫生部 2009 年降低产妇死亡率的战略赋予了两种符合熟练接生员标准的非医师模式的作用:产科护士和专业助产士。本研究比较和对比了这两种提供方类型与医疗模式,分析了他们各自的培训、实践范围,以及他们作为熟练接生员融入公共系统的看法和/或经验。
本文综合了定性研究,这些研究是对三种产科护理模式进行定量和定性评估的一部分:专业助产士 (PM)、产科护士 (ON) 和全科医生 (GP)。共对 PM、ON、GP 和专家进行了 27 次使用半结构化指南的个别访谈。访谈按照扎根理论的原则进行了转录,在数据中创建了代码和类别。我们在 ATLAS.ti 中分析了数据。
所有接受采访的提供者都对自己的专业培训充满信心,并承认专业助产士和产科护士都有必要的技能和知识来照顾正常怀孕和分娩的妇女。这三种类型的提供者都认识到自己实践的局限性,即在处理并发症方面。我们发现,每种类型的从业者对分娩的概念和过程及其在这个过程中的角色有不同的看法。PM 和 ON 作为分娩提供者面临的纳入障碍存在于个人、医院和系统层面。GP 对自己处理分娩的能力和培训提出质疑,特别是对变得复杂的分娩,而且对助产士模式,特别是与临床环境相关的助产士模式,也提出了质疑。
墨西哥公共卫生部门的医院产科工作量很大;医生还要承担非产科病例的额外负担。在初级保健中心一级引入非医师模式,为低风险、正常分娩提供服务,将有助于减少不必要的转诊。这些提供者在医院层面也有作用。