Suppr超能文献

纤维增强二氧化碳激光与电灼在啮齿动物口腔舌切除术后组织病理学和行为学比较

Histopathological and postoperative behavioral comparison of rodent oral tongue resection: fiber-enabled CO2 laser versus electrocautery.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;147(4):716-21. doi: 10.1177/0194599812445559. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare operative time and hemostasis of fiber-enabled CO(2) laser (FECL) energy to that of the electrocautery (EC) technique for oral tongue resection, to compare return to oral intake and preoperative weight after FECL and EC resection, and to compare histologic changes in adjacent tissue after FECL and EC resection.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective animal study.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The CO(2) laser fiber and the Bovie cautery were each used to resect the anterior tongue in 15 adult rats. Fixative perfusion and killing were performed on postoperative day 0 (n = 10), 3 (n = 10), or 7 (n = 10). Body weight, food intake, and water intake were recorded daily for 3- and 7-day survival rats. After preparation for histologic analysis, the tongue tissue was graded with a mucosal wound-healing scale (MWHS).

RESULTS

A higher incidence of intraoperative bleeding and shorter operative times were noted in the EC group. No statistically significant difference in postoperative food or water intake between the EC and FECL groups was noted. The FECL group returned to baseline weight by postoperative day 6. MWHS scores were lower in the EC group by postoperative day 3 and lower in the FECL group by postoperative day 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Both EC and FECL are effective for resection of the tongue in rats. EC has the advantage of shorter operative time and lower MWHS scores by postoperative day 3; FECL has the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding, faster return to baseline body weight, and lower MWHS score by postoperative day 7.

摘要

目的

比较纤维增强二氧化碳激光(FECL)与电灼(EC)技术在舌部切除术中的手术时间和止血效果,比较 FECL 和 EC 切除术后恢复经口进食和术前体重的情况,以及比较 FECL 和 EC 切除术后相邻组织的组织学变化。

研究设计

前瞻性动物研究。

设置

研究实验室。

受试者和方法

使用 CO2 激光光纤和 Bovie 电烙器分别切除 15 只成年大鼠的舌前部分。术后第 0 天(n=10)、第 3 天(n=10)或第 7 天(n=10)进行固定灌注和处死。记录 3 天和 7 天存活大鼠的每日体重、食物摄入量和水摄入量。在准备进行组织学分析后,使用黏膜伤口愈合评分(MWHS)对舌组织进行分级。

结果

EC 组术中出血发生率较高,手术时间较短。EC 和 FECL 组术后食物或水摄入量无统计学差异。FECL 组在术后第 6 天恢复到基线体重。EC 组在术后第 3 天和 FECL 组在术后第 7 天的 MWHS 评分较低。

结论

EC 和 FECL 均能有效切除大鼠的舌部。EC 的优势在于手术时间更短,术后第 3 天 MWHS 评分较低;FECL 的优势在于术中出血较少,更快恢复到基线体重,术后第 7 天 MWHS 评分较低。

相似文献

1
Histopathological and postoperative behavioral comparison of rodent oral tongue resection: fiber-enabled CO2 laser versus electrocautery.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;147(4):716-21. doi: 10.1177/0194599812445559. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
2
Comparison of fiber delivered CO laser and electrocautery in transoral robot assisted tongue base surgery.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 May;274(5):2273-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4449-3. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
3
Effects of scalpel, electrocautery, and CO2 and KTP lasers on wound healing in rat tongues.
Laryngoscope. 1998 Mar;108(3):373-80. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199803000-00012.

引用本文的文献

2
Application of laser in oral surgery.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Summer;5(3):97-107.
3
Fire ignition during laser surgery in pet rodents.
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Sep 26;8:177. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-177.

本文引用的文献

1
Remodeling of the rat gingiva induced by CO2 laser coagulation mode.
Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Dec;40(10):695-703. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20712.
2
Microdebrider vs electrocautery: a comparison of tonsillar wound healing histopathology in a canine model.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;138(4):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.11.016.
3
Effects of scalpel, electrocautery, and CO2 and KTP lasers on wound healing in rat tongues.
Laryngoscope. 1998 Mar;108(3):373-80. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199803000-00012.
4
Resection of the tongue with the carbon dioxide laser.
J Laryngol Otol. 1982 Jun;96(6):529-43. doi: 10.1017/s002221510009280x.
5
Laser surgery of the vocal cords. An experimental study with carbon dioxide lasers on dogs.
Laryngoscope. 1972 Dec;82(12):2204-16. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197212000-00009.
6
A review of carbon dioxide laser surgery in the oral cavity and pharynx.
J Laryngol Otol. 1986 Jan;100(1):69-77. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100098765.
7
Lasers for otosclerosis: CO2 vs. Argon and KTP-532.
Laryngoscope. 1989 Jun;99(6 Pt 2 Suppl 46):1-8.
8
Soft tissue effects of the THC:YAG laser on canine vocal cords.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992 Sep;107(3):438-43. doi: 10.1177/019459989210700317.
9
Laser surgery in otolaryngology: interaction of CO2 laser and soft tissue.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976 Jan 30;267:263-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb41614.x.
10
Transoral management of localized carcinoma of the oral cavity using the CO2 laser.
Laryngoscope. 1979 Jun;89(6 Pt 1):897-905. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197906000-00005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验