Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr 1;146(4):339-346. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4605.
Several temperature-controlled surgical instruments (TCSIs) have been used in tonsillectomy. However, to our knowledge, a meta-analysis of the differences between modern TCSIs and electrocautery (EC) has not been conducted.
To compare TCSIs with EC with regard to the intraoperative and postoperative parameters of tonsillectomy.
PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched independently by 2 authors for relevant articles.
A literature search identified randomized clinical trials comparing the outcomes of TCSIs vs EC. The search keywords were harmonic scalpel, ultracision, PlasmaBlade, coblation, radiofrequency ablation, and tonsillectomy. Studies of adult and adolescent patients were included.
Data from each study were extracted. A random-effects model was used in the pooled analysis.
Four outcomes were analyzed: postoperative pain level on days 1, 2, 7, and 14 after surgery; postoperative bleeding; operative time; and intraoperative blood loss.
This meta-analysis included 11 studies with a total of 629 unique patients. (Mean ages ranged from 16 to 55 years.) The studies were further categorized by the methods of comparison. Five articles used between-participant comparisons, and 6 used within-participant comparisons (of the left vs right sides of the participant's body). The pooled results of the studies with between-participant measures showed that postoperative pain scores were lower in the TCSI group on the first day (standardized mean differences [SMD], -0.41 [95% CI, -0.77 to -0.06]) and seventh day (SMD, -0.76 [95% CI, -1.47 to -0.04]). The pooled results of the studies with within-participant measures showed that the postoperative pain scores were lower in the TCSI group on the first day (SMD, -0.37 [95% CI, -0.63 to -0.12]) and second day (SMD, -0.60 [95% CI, -1.10 to -0.10]). The pooled analysis of overall bleeding, major bleeding, minor bleeding, primary bleeding, and secondary bleeding in both the types of studies with between-participant measures and those with within-participant measures showed no significant differences between the TCSI and EC groups. Intraoperative blood loss and operative time were not significantly different between the groups.
Compared with EC, TCSIs were associated with significantly reduced pain on the first day after tonsillectomy, per this meta-analysis. The rates of overall bleeding, primary bleeding, secondary bleeding, major bleeding, and minor bleeding between TCSIs and EC were comparable. Intraoperative blood loss and operative time also showed no significant intergroup differences. Surgeons may consider using these modern instruments according to personal experiences, preferences, and cost-effectiveness criteria.
已有多种控温手术器械(TCSI)用于扁桃体切除术。但据我们所知,尚未对现代 TCSI 与电外科(EC)之间的差异进行荟萃分析。
比较 TCSI 与 EC 在扁桃体切除术中及术后参数方面的差异。
两位作者独立检索 PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆,检索词包括 harmonic scalpel、ultracision、PlasmaBlade、coblation、radiofrequency ablation 和 tonsillectomy。纳入成人和青少年患者的随机临床试验。
文献检索确定了比较 TCSI 与 EC 结局的随机临床试验。搜索关键词包括 harmonic scalpel、ultracision、PlasmaBlade、coblation、radiofrequency ablation 和 tonsillectomy。研究纳入成年和青少年患者。
从每项研究中提取数据。使用随机效应模型进行汇总分析。
分析 4 项结局:术后第 1、2、7、14 天的术后疼痛程度;术后出血;手术时间;术中失血量。
本荟萃分析纳入了 11 项共 629 例患者的研究。(平均年龄 16 至 55 岁)。这些研究进一步按比较方法分类。5 篇文章采用组间比较,6 篇文章采用组内比较(参与者身体左侧与右侧之间)。采用组间措施的研究的汇总结果显示,TCSI 组术后第 1 天(标准化均数差值 [SMD],-0.41 [95% CI,-0.77 至-0.06])和第 7 天(SMD,-0.76 [95% CI,-1.47 至-0.04])的术后疼痛评分较低。采用组内措施的研究的汇总结果显示,TCSI 组术后第 1 天(SMD,-0.37 [95% CI,-0.63 至-0.12])和第 2 天(SMD,-0.60 [95% CI,-1.10 至-0.10])的术后疼痛评分较低。采用组间措施和组内措施的研究对总体出血、大出血、小出血、原发性出血和继发性出血的汇总分析显示,TCSI 组与 EC 组之间无显著差异。两组术中出血量和手术时间无显著差异。
与 EC 相比,本荟萃分析显示 TCSI 与扁桃体切除术后第 1 天的疼痛显著减轻相关。TCSI 组与 EC 组之间的总体出血、原发性出血、继发性出血、大出血和小出血发生率相当。术中出血量和手术时间也无显著的组间差异。外科医生可根据个人经验、偏好和成本效益标准考虑使用这些现代器械。