• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Adolescents and Adults Undergoing Temperature-Controlled Surgical Instruments vs Electrocautery in Tonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.在扁桃体切除术中医用温控手术器械与电烙术用于青少年和成年人的系统评价和随机临床试验荟萃分析。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr 1;146(4):339-346. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4605.
2
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.用于扁桃体切除术的低温等离子消融术与其他手术技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub3.
3
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.用于扁桃体切除术的低温等离子消融术与其他手术技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub2.
4
Effect of the BiZact™ Low-Temperature Dissecting Device on Intra- and Postoperative Morbidities Related to Tonsillectomy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BiZact™ 低温解剖装置对扁桃体切除术相关术中及术后并发症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 29;60(9):1415. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091415.
5
Modern technology-assisted vs conventional tonsillectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.现代技术辅助与传统扁桃体切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;137(6):558-70. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.93.
6
Coblation tonsillectomy versus laser tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.低温等离子扁桃体切除术与激光扁桃体切除术的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Dec;279(12):5511-5520. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07534-0. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
7
CO laser or dissection tonsillectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.CO2激光或解剖扁桃体切除术:临床结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2023 Feb;50(1):2-16. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 18.
8
Dexamethasone reduces pain, vomiting and overall complications following tonsillectomy in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.地塞米松可降低成人扁桃体切除术后的疼痛、呕吐和总体并发症:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Dec;36(6):531-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02373.x.
9
Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery tonsillectomy: a comparative study in adult patients.谐波手术刀与电刀扁桃体切除术:成年患者的比较研究
J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Mar;61(3):256-9.
10
Coblation versus BiZact extra-capsular tonsillectomy in adults: a randomized control trial.低温射频消融术与 BiZact 法在成年人扁桃体切除术的对比:一项随机对照试验。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 May;94(5):861-866. doi: 10.1111/ans.19007. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and Practices in Tonsil Surgery-A National Survey for Otorhinolaryngologists.扁桃体手术的趋势与实践——一项针对耳鼻喉科医生的全国性调查
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jun 25;10(3):e70178. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70178. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Long-Term Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Laser Tonsillotomy vs Tonsillectomy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.激光扁桃体切除术与扁桃体切除术的长期疗效和成本效益:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e254858. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4858.
3
Effect of monopolar diathermy power settings on postoperative pain, wound healing, and tissue damage after tonsillectomy: a randomized clinical trial.双极电凝与单极电切在扁桃体切除术后对疼痛、伤口愈合和组织损伤的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50633-z.
4
Radiofrequency Versus Electrocautery in Pediatric Tonsillectomy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.小儿扁桃体切除术中射频与电灼术的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5616-5623. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02950-w. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
5
Intracapsular tonsillectomy in the treatment of recurrent and chronic tonsillitis in adults: a protocol of a prospective, single-blinded, randomised study with a 5-year follow-up (the FINITE trial).扁桃体囊内切除术治疗成人复发性和慢性扁桃体炎的前瞻性、单盲、随机研究方案,随访时间为 5 年(FINITE 试验)。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 14;12(9):e062722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062722.
6
Intrapatient Comparison of Coblation versus Electrocautery Tonsillectomy in Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.儿童低温等离子射频消融术与电灼扁桃体切除术的患者内比较:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 4;11(15):4561. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154561.
7
Acupuncture Analgesia in Patients with Postoperative Neck Pain: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.术后颈部疼痛患者的针刺镇痛:系统评价与Meta分析方案
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 20;2022:1226702. doi: 10.1155/2022/1226702. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the therapeutic effects of coblation tonsillectomy versus electrocautery tonsillectomy.低温等离子体扁桃体切除术与电灼扁桃体切除术治疗效果的比较系统评价与荟萃分析。
Gland Surg. 2022 Jan;11(1):175-185. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-832.

本文引用的文献

1
Experience is more important than technology in paediatric post-tonsillectomy bleeding.在小儿扁桃体切除术后出血方面,经验比技术更重要。
J Laryngol Otol. 2017 Jul;131(S2):S35-S40. doi: 10.1017/S0022215117000755. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
2
Coblation vs. Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults.低温等离子射频消融术与电凝切除术治疗青少年及成人扁桃体的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jun;6(2):90-3. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2013.6.2.90. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Six years of evidence-based adult dissection tonsillectomy with ultrasonic scalpel, bipolar electrocautery, bipolar radiofrequency or 'cold steel' dissection.六年基于证据的成人扁桃体切除术,采用超声刀、双极电凝、双极射频或“冷钢”进行剥离。
J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Oct;126(10):1056-62. doi: 10.1017/S0022215112002022.
4
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
5
Quantitative comparison of surgical margin histology following excision with traditional electrosurgery and a low-thermal-injury dissection device.切除后传统电外科手术与低热损伤解剖装置切缘组织学的定量比较。
J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):746-54. doi: 10.1002/jso.22012. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
6
Postoperative pain after adult tonsillectomy with PlasmaKnife compared to monopolar electrocautery.成人扁桃体切除术后使用等离子刀与单极电凝相比的术后疼痛。
Laryngoscope. 2011 Jul;121(7):1416-21. doi: 10.1002/lary.21806. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
7
Clinical practice guideline: tonsillectomy in children.临床实践指南:儿童扁桃体切除术。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jan;144(1 Suppl):S1-30. doi: 10.1177/0194599810389949.
8
Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery tonsillectomy: a comparative study in adult patients.谐波手术刀与电刀扁桃体切除术:成年患者的比较研究
J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Mar;61(3):256-9.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
10
Electrosurgery with cellular precision.具有细胞精准度的电外科手术。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Feb;55(2 Pt 2):838-41. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.914539.

在扁桃体切除术中医用温控手术器械与电烙术用于青少年和成年人的系统评价和随机临床试验荟萃分析。

Adolescents and Adults Undergoing Temperature-Controlled Surgical Instruments vs Electrocautery in Tonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr 1;146(4):339-346. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4605.

DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4605
PMID:32027341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7042903/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Several temperature-controlled surgical instruments (TCSIs) have been used in tonsillectomy. However, to our knowledge, a meta-analysis of the differences between modern TCSIs and electrocautery (EC) has not been conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To compare TCSIs with EC with regard to the intraoperative and postoperative parameters of tonsillectomy.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched independently by 2 authors for relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION

A literature search identified randomized clinical trials comparing the outcomes of TCSIs vs EC. The search keywords were harmonic scalpel, ultracision, PlasmaBlade, coblation, radiofrequency ablation, and tonsillectomy. Studies of adult and adolescent patients were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data from each study were extracted. A random-effects model was used in the pooled analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Four outcomes were analyzed: postoperative pain level on days 1, 2, 7, and 14 after surgery; postoperative bleeding; operative time; and intraoperative blood loss.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 11 studies with a total of 629 unique patients. (Mean ages ranged from 16 to 55 years.) The studies were further categorized by the methods of comparison. Five articles used between-participant comparisons, and 6 used within-participant comparisons (of the left vs right sides of the participant's body). The pooled results of the studies with between-participant measures showed that postoperative pain scores were lower in the TCSI group on the first day (standardized mean differences [SMD], -0.41 [95% CI, -0.77 to -0.06]) and seventh day (SMD, -0.76 [95% CI, -1.47 to -0.04]). The pooled results of the studies with within-participant measures showed that the postoperative pain scores were lower in the TCSI group on the first day (SMD, -0.37 [95% CI, -0.63 to -0.12]) and second day (SMD, -0.60 [95% CI, -1.10 to -0.10]). The pooled analysis of overall bleeding, major bleeding, minor bleeding, primary bleeding, and secondary bleeding in both the types of studies with between-participant measures and those with within-participant measures showed no significant differences between the TCSI and EC groups. Intraoperative blood loss and operative time were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Compared with EC, TCSIs were associated with significantly reduced pain on the first day after tonsillectomy, per this meta-analysis. The rates of overall bleeding, primary bleeding, secondary bleeding, major bleeding, and minor bleeding between TCSIs and EC were comparable. Intraoperative blood loss and operative time also showed no significant intergroup differences. Surgeons may consider using these modern instruments according to personal experiences, preferences, and cost-effectiveness criteria.

摘要

重要性

已有多种控温手术器械(TCSI)用于扁桃体切除术。但据我们所知,尚未对现代 TCSI 与电外科(EC)之间的差异进行荟萃分析。

目的

比较 TCSI 与 EC 在扁桃体切除术中及术后参数方面的差异。

数据来源

两位作者独立检索 PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆,检索词包括 harmonic scalpel、ultracision、PlasmaBlade、coblation、radiofrequency ablation 和 tonsillectomy。纳入成人和青少年患者的随机临床试验。

研究选择

文献检索确定了比较 TCSI 与 EC 结局的随机临床试验。搜索关键词包括 harmonic scalpel、ultracision、PlasmaBlade、coblation、radiofrequency ablation 和 tonsillectomy。研究纳入成年和青少年患者。

数据提取和综合

从每项研究中提取数据。使用随机效应模型进行汇总分析。

主要结局和测量指标

分析 4 项结局:术后第 1、2、7、14 天的术后疼痛程度;术后出血;手术时间;术中失血量。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了 11 项共 629 例患者的研究。(平均年龄 16 至 55 岁)。这些研究进一步按比较方法分类。5 篇文章采用组间比较,6 篇文章采用组内比较(参与者身体左侧与右侧之间)。采用组间措施的研究的汇总结果显示,TCSI 组术后第 1 天(标准化均数差值 [SMD],-0.41 [95% CI,-0.77 至-0.06])和第 7 天(SMD,-0.76 [95% CI,-1.47 至-0.04])的术后疼痛评分较低。采用组内措施的研究的汇总结果显示,TCSI 组术后第 1 天(SMD,-0.37 [95% CI,-0.63 至-0.12])和第 2 天(SMD,-0.60 [95% CI,-1.10 至-0.10])的术后疼痛评分较低。采用组间措施和组内措施的研究对总体出血、大出血、小出血、原发性出血和继发性出血的汇总分析显示,TCSI 组与 EC 组之间无显著差异。两组术中出血量和手术时间无显著差异。

结论和相关性

与 EC 相比,本荟萃分析显示 TCSI 与扁桃体切除术后第 1 天的疼痛显著减轻相关。TCSI 组与 EC 组之间的总体出血、原发性出血、继发性出血、大出血和小出血发生率相当。术中出血量和手术时间也无显著的组间差异。外科医生可根据个人经验、偏好和成本效益标准考虑使用这些现代器械。