Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany.
Neuropsychobiology. 2012 Jun;65(4):188-94. doi: 10.1159/000337000. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Recently, a framework has been presented that links vigilance regulation, i.e. tonic brain arousal, with clinical symptoms of affective disorders. Against this background, the aim of this study was to deepen the knowledge of vigilance regulation by (1) identifying different patterns of vigilance regulation at rest in healthy subjects (n = 141) and (2) comparing the frequency distribution of these patterns between unmedicated patients with major depression (MD; n = 30) and healthy controls (HCs; n = 30).
Each 1-second segment of 15-min resting EEGs from 141 healthy subjects was classified as 1 of 7 different vigilance stages using the Vigilance Algorithm Leipzig. K-means clustering was used to distinguish different patterns of EEG vigilance regulation. The frequency distribution of these patterns was analyzed in independent data of 30 unmedicated MD patients and 30 matched HCs using a χ² test.
The 3-cluster solution with a stable, a slowly declining and an unstable vigilance regulation pattern yielded the highest mathematical quality and performed best for separation of MD patients and HCs (χ² = 13.34; p < 0.001). Patterns with stable vigilance regulation were found significantly more often in patients with MD than in HCs.
A stable vigilance regulation pattern, derived from a large sample of HCs, characterizes most patients with MD and separates them from matched HCs with a sensitivity between 67 and 73% and a specificity between 67 and 80%. The pattern of vigilance regulation might be a useful biomarker for delineating MD subgroups, e.g. for treatment prediction.
背景/目的:最近,提出了一个框架,将警觉调节(即大脑紧张性觉醒)与情感障碍的临床症状联系起来。在此背景下,本研究旨在通过(1)在健康受试者中(n = 141)识别静息时警觉调节的不同模式,(2)比较这些模式在未经药物治疗的重度抑郁症(MD;n = 30)患者和健康对照组(HC;n = 30)之间的频率分布,来加深对警觉调节的认识。
使用莱比锡警觉算法(Vigilance Algorithm Leipzig)将 141 名健康受试者的 15 分钟静息 EEG 的每 1 秒片段分类为 7 种不同警觉阶段之一。K-均值聚类用于区分不同的 EEG 警觉调节模式。使用 χ²检验分析这些模式在 30 名未经药物治疗的 MD 患者和 30 名匹配的 HC 的独立数据中的频率分布。
具有稳定、缓慢下降和不稳定警觉调节模式的 3 聚类解决方案产生了最高的数学质量,并对 MD 患者和 HC 的分离效果最佳(χ² = 13.34;p < 0.001)。具有稳定警觉调节模式的模式在 MD 患者中比在 HC 中更频繁地出现。
从大量 HC 中得出的稳定警觉调节模式特征最符合大多数 MD 患者,并将他们与匹配的 HC 分开,敏感性在 67%至 73%之间,特异性在 67%至 80%之间。警觉调节模式可能是描绘 MD 亚组的有用生物标志物,例如用于治疗预测。