• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用基于语义和语音的特征方法治疗失语症中的命名缺陷。

The use of semantic- and phonological-based feature approaches to treat naming deficits in aphasia.

作者信息

Hashimoto Naomi

机构信息

Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin - River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022-5001, USA.

出版信息

Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Jun;26(6):518-53. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.663051.

DOI:10.3109/02699206.2012.663051
PMID:22540360
Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare approaches highlighting either semantic or phonological features to treat naming deficits in aphasia. Treatment focused on improving picture naming. An alternating treatments design was used with a multiple baseline design across stimuli to examine effects of both approaches in two participants with varying degrees of anomia. The features approaches were modified in that three, rather than six, features were used. Significant differential effects were found across participants; this appeared to be a function of each participant's strengths or preferences over the course of treatment. Modest generalization effects were obtained for one participant. Naming error analyses revealed patterns suggestive of increased lexical access for both participants. These findings provide evidence that using a modified features-based protocol can improve naming when incorporating both semantic and phonological feature cues. Naming error patterns can provide additional evidence of improved naming during treatment.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较突出语义或语音特征的方法,以治疗失语症中的命名缺陷。治疗重点在于改善图片命名。采用交替治疗设计,并在刺激物上采用多基线设计,以检验这两种方法对两名不同程度命名障碍患者的效果。对特征方法进行了修改,即使用三个而非六个特征。在不同参与者中发现了显著的差异效应;这似乎是每个参与者在治疗过程中的优势或偏好所致。其中一名参与者获得了适度的泛化效应。命名错误分析揭示了两名参与者词汇通达增加的模式。这些发现提供了证据,表明使用基于特征的改良方案,在纳入语义和语音特征线索时可以改善命名。命名错误模式可以为治疗期间命名改善提供额外证据。

相似文献

1
The use of semantic- and phonological-based feature approaches to treat naming deficits in aphasia.使用基于语义和语音的特征方法治疗失语症中的命名缺陷。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Jun;26(6):518-53. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.663051.
2
Phonological therapy in jargon aphasia: effects on naming and neologisms.命名障碍性失语症的语音治疗:对命名和新语的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Sep-Oct;48(5):582-95. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12038. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
3
The use of a modified semantic features analysis approach in aphasia.改良语义特征分析方法在失语症中的应用。
J Commun Disord. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):459-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
4
A case series comparison of semantically focused vs. phonologically focused cued naming treatment in aphasia.失语症中语义聚焦与语音聚焦线索命名治疗的病例系列比较
Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(1):1-27. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1326166. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Efficacy and generalization of treatment for aphasic naming errors.失语症命名错误治疗的疗效与普遍性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Aug;70(8):632-6.
6
Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes.两种流利性失语综合征中命名障碍的语义特征分析治疗
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2004 Aug;13(3):236-49. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2004/025).
7
Focusing on the locus of the breakdown for treatment of anomia: a pilot study.关注命名障碍治疗的突破口:一项试点研究。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2024 May 3;38(5):477-507. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2023.2221374. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
8
Phonomotor Versus Semantic Feature Analysis Treatment for Anomia in 58 Persons With Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.语音运动与语义特征分析治疗 58 例失语症患者命名障碍的随机对照试验。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Dec 5;62(12):4464-4482. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0257. Print 2019 Dec 18.
9
The contrast between cueing and/or observation in therapy for verb retrieval in post-stroke aphasia.中风后失语症动词检索治疗中提示和/或观察的对比。
J Commun Disord. 2015 Mar-Apr;54:43-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Effectiveness of contextual repetition priming treatments for anomia depends on intact access to semantics.语境重复启动疗法治疗命名障碍的有效性取决于语义通达是否完整。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Nov;12(6):853-66. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706061030.

引用本文的文献

1
Simultaneous Normalization and Compensatory Changes in Right Hemisphere Connectivity during Aphasia Therapy.失语症治疗期间右半球连接性的同步归一化和代偿性变化
Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 8;11(10):1330. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101330.
2
Individualized response to semantic versus phonological aphasia therapies in stroke.中风患者对语义性失语症与音韵性失语症疗法的个体化反应。
Brain Commun. 2021 Aug 5;3(3):fcab174. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab174. eCollection 2021.
3
Integrated Discourse Therapy After Glioblastoma: A Case Report of Face-To-Face and Tele-NeuroRehabilitation Treatment Delivery.
胶质母细胞瘤后的综合话语疗法:面对面及远程神经康复治疗实施的病例报告
Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 19;11:583452. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.583452. eCollection 2020.
4
Typicality-based semantic treatment for anomia results in multiple levels of generalisation.基于典型性的语义治疗对命名障碍的泛化有多种层次的效果。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Jun;30(5):802-828. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1499533. Epub 2018 Jul 20.