Beisswanger Elena, Hahn Udo
Jena University Language and Information Engineering (JULIE) Lab, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.
J Biomed Semantics. 2012 Apr 24;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-3-S1-S4.
Identifying relationships between hitherto unrelated entities in different ontologies is the key task of ontology alignment. An alignment is either manually created by domain experts or automatically by an alignment system. In recent years, several alignment systems have been made available, each using its own set of methods for relation detection. To evaluate and compare these systems, typically a manually created alignment is used, the so-called reference alignment. Based on our experience with several of these reference alignments we derived requirements and translated them into simple quality checks to ensure the alignments' validity and also their reusability. In this article, these quality checks are applied to a standard reference alignment in the biomedical domain, the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative Anatomy track reference alignment, and two more recent data sets covering multiple domains, including but not restricted to anatomy and biology.
识别不同本体中迄今无关实体之间的关系是本体对齐的关键任务。对齐方式要么由领域专家手动创建,要么由对齐系统自动创建。近年来,已经有了几个可用的对齐系统,每个系统都使用自己的一组关系检测方法。为了评估和比较这些系统,通常会使用手动创建的对齐方式,即所谓的参考对齐。基于我们对其中几个参考对齐的经验,我们得出了要求并将其转化为简单的质量检查,以确保对齐的有效性及其可重用性。在本文中,这些质量检查应用于生物医学领域的一个标准参考对齐,即本体对齐评估倡议解剖学轨道参考对齐,以及另外两个涵盖多个领域(包括但不限于解剖学和生物学)的最新数据集。