Suppr超能文献

对使用助行器和轮椅的儿童的PEDI-CAT移动性项目库的初步评估。

A preliminary evaluation of the PEDI-CAT Mobility item bank for children using walking aids and wheelchairs.

作者信息

Dumas Helene M, Fragala-Pinkham Maria A, Feng Tian, Haley Stephen M

机构信息

Research Center for Children with Special Health Care Needs, Franciscan Hospital for Children, Boston, MA 02135, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2012;5(1):29-35. doi: 10.3233/PRM-2011-0184.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the discriminant validity and scoring patterns of the PEDI-CAT Mobility item bank for children who use a walking aid or wheelchair.

METHODS

Parents whose children use a walking aid (n=35) or a wheelchair (n=31) completed the full PEDI-CAT Mobility item bank (105 items including 13 walking aid and 14 wheelchair items) on-line. An independent sample t-test was used to examine mean scores between the groups. Point spread and placement of the scores along the overall 20-80 test scale and response patterns for the 27 mobility device items were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Mean scaled scores were significantly different (p < 0.001) for the two groups. Mean score for the Wheelchair Group (38.37, SD=7.09) was lower than the Walking Aid Group (46.97, SD=5.10). The Walking Aid Group started and ended higher on the 20 to 80 scale metric than the Wheelchair Group. No floor or ceiling effects were seen for the scoring of the 27 items specifying use of a mobility device.

CONCLUSION

The %scores of the PEDI-CAT Mobility domain could differentiate the functional mobility status between known groups of children who use a walking aid or wheelchair and provides specific items to measure functional mobility with use of a mobility device.

摘要

目的

检验儿童移动能力评估测试(PEDI-CAT)移动项目库对使用助行器或轮椅儿童的区分效度和评分模式。

方法

其子女使用助行器(n = 35)或轮椅(n = 31)的家长在线完成了完整的PEDI-CAT移动项目库(105个项目,包括13个助行器项目和14个轮椅项目)。采用独立样本t检验来检验两组之间的平均得分。对27个移动设备项目在总体20 - 80分测试量表上的得分分布和位置以及反应模式进行了描述性分析。

结果

两组的平均量表得分存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。轮椅组的平均得分(38.37,标准差 = 7.09)低于助行器组(46.97,标准差 = 5.10)。在20至80分的量表指标上,助行器组的起始和结束得分均高于轮椅组。在对27个指定使用移动设备的项目进行评分时,未观察到地板效应或天花板效应。

结论

PEDI-CAT移动领域的得分能够区分使用助行器或轮椅的已知儿童群体之间的功能性移动状态,并提供了用于测量使用移动设备时功能性移动能力的特定项目。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验