Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-Dong, Bundang-Gu, Sungnam, Kyungki 463-707, Korea.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep;470(9):2613-21. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2368-6. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
Although various radiographic measurements have been developed and used for evaluating hallux valgus, not all are universally believed to be necessary and their relationships have not been clearly established. Determining which are related could provide some insight into which might be useful and which would not.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We investigated the reliability of eight radiographic measurements used to evaluate hallux valgus, and determined which were correlated and which predicted the hallux valgus angle.
We determined eight radiographic indices for 732 patients (mean age, 51 years; SD, 17 years; 107 males and 625 females) with hallux valgus: hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, hallux interphalangeal angle, distal metatarsal articular angle, proximal phalangeal articular angle, simplified metatarsus adductus angle, first metatarsal protrusion distance, and sesamoid rotation angle. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of each radiographic measurement were analyzed on 36 feet from 36 randomly selected patients. Correlations among the radiographic measurements were analyzed. Radiographic measurements predicting hallux valgus angle were evaluated using multiple regression analysis.
Hallux valgus angle had the highest reliability, whereas the distal metatarsal articular angle and simplified metatarsus adductus angle had the lowest. Distal metatarsal articular angle, intermetatarsal angle, and sesamoid rotation angle had the highest correlations with hallux valgus angle. Distal metatarsal articular angle correlated with sesamoid rotation angle. The intermetatarsal angle, interphalangeal angle, distal metatarsal articular angle, first metatarsal protrusion distance, sesamoid rotation angle, and metatarsus adductus angle predicted the hallux valgus angle.
We suggest using hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, interphalangeal angle, sesamoid rotation angle, and first metatarsal protrusion distance considering their reliability and prediction of the deformity.
尽管已经开发和使用了各种影像学测量方法来评估拇外翻,但并非所有方法都被普遍认为是必要的,它们之间的关系也没有明确建立。确定哪些方法相关,可以为哪些方法可能有用,哪些方法可能无用提供一些见解。
问题/目的:我们研究了 732 例(平均年龄 51 岁,标准差 17 岁;男性 107 例,女性 625 例)拇外翻患者的 8 种影像学测量的可靠性,并确定了哪些方法是相关的,哪些方法可以预测拇外翻角度。
我们确定了 8 种影像学指标来评估拇外翻:拇外翻角、跖骨间角、近节趾骨间角、远侧跖骨关节角、近节趾骨关节角、简化跖骨内收角、第一跖骨突出距离和籽骨旋转角。对 36 名随机选择的患者的 36 只脚的每种影像学测量的观察者内和观察者间可靠性进行了分析。分析了影像学测量之间的相关性。使用多元回归分析评估预测拇外翻角度的影像学测量。
拇外翻角度的可靠性最高,而远侧跖骨关节角和简化跖骨内收角的可靠性最低。远侧跖骨关节角、跖骨间角和籽骨旋转角与拇外翻角度相关性最高。远侧跖骨关节角与籽骨旋转角相关。跖骨间角、近节趾骨间角、远侧跖骨关节角、第一跖骨突出距离、籽骨旋转角和跖骨内收角预测了拇外翻角度。
我们建议考虑这些影像学测量的可靠性和对畸形的预测,使用拇外翻角度、跖骨间角、近节趾骨间角、籽骨旋转角和第一跖骨突出距离。