Suppr超能文献

学龄前儿童对心理状态和行为在假装中的作用的理解。

Preschooler's Understanding of the Role of Mental States and Action in Pretense.

作者信息

Ganea Patricia A, Lillard Angeline S, Turkheimer Eric

机构信息

University of Virginia.

出版信息

J Cogn Dev. 2004 Jan 1;5(2):213-238. doi: 10.1207/s15327647jcd0502_3. Epub 2009 Nov 13.

Abstract

This research investigated 3- to 5-year-old's understanding of the role of intentional states and action in pretense. There are two main perspectives on how children conceptualize pretense. One view is that children understand the mental aspects of pretending (the rich interpretation). The alternative view is that children conceptualize pretense as "acting-like" and do not appreciate that the mind is crucial to pretense (the lean interpretation). The experiments in this article used a novel approach to test these two interpretations. Children were presented with two types of videotaped scenarios. In Experiment 1, children were presented with a scenario in which people wanted to be like something else (e.g., a kangaroo) and either acted like it or did not act like it. Children were asked whether the protagonists were pretending and whether they were thinking about the pretend entity. In Experiment 2, children were presented with the Experiment 1 scenarios and also with a scenario in which a person had the intention to do something else (e.g., look for her keys) but whose actions were similar to those of a pretend entity (e.g., a bear). Children were asked about the pretense, thoughts, and the intentions of the protagonists. Experiment 3 tested for the effect of asking an open-ended versus a forced-choice question on the Experiment 2 tasks. The results of this study suggest that in certain facilitating conditions (e.g., intention information salient, forced-choice question) children have an early understanding of the role of mind in pretense.

摘要

本研究调查了3至5岁儿童对假装中意向状态和行为作用的理解。关于儿童如何将假装概念化,主要有两种观点。一种观点认为儿童理解假装的心理层面(丰富解释)。另一种观点认为儿童将假装概念化为“像……一样行动”,并不理解心智对假装至关重要(精简解释)。本文中的实验采用了一种新颖的方法来检验这两种解释。向儿童展示了两种类型的录像场景。在实验1中,向儿童展示了一个场景,其中人们想要变得像其他事物(例如袋鼠),并且要么表现得像它,要么不像它。询问儿童主人公是否在假装,以及他们是否在思考假装的实体。在实验2中,向儿童展示了实验1中的场景,以及一个场景,其中一个人有做其他事情的意图(例如找她的钥匙),但其行为与一个假装实体(例如熊)的行为相似。询问儿童关于主人公的假装、想法和意图。实验3测试了在实验2任务中询问开放式问题与强制选择问题的效果。这项研究的结果表明,在某些促进条件下(例如,意图信息突出、强制选择问题),儿童对心智在假装中的作用有早期理解。

相似文献

4
Do children learn from pretense?孩子们会从假装游戏中学习吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Feb;130:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
8
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Children's understanding of the knowledge prerequisites of drawing and pretending.
Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):1004-15. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.6.1004.
3
Executive accounts of theory-of-mind development.心理理论发展的执行性解释。
Child Dev. 2001 May-Jun;72(3):688-90. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00306.
4
Preschoolers' understanding of pretense and presumption of congruity between action and representation.
Dev Psychol. 1999 Nov;35(6):1414-25. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.6.1414.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验