Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 655 Knight Way, Stanford, CA 94305-7298, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Aug;103(2):327-42. doi: 10.1037/a0028127. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
We propose that guilt proneness is a critical characteristic of leaders and find support for this hypothesis across 3 studies. Participants in the first study rated a set of guilt-prone behaviors as more indicative of leadership potential than a set of less guilt-prone behaviors. In a follow-up study, guilt-prone participants in a leaderless group task engaged in more leadership behaviors than did less guilt-prone participants. In a third, and final, study, we move to the field and analyze 360° feedback from a group of young managers working in a range of industries. The results indicate that highly guilt-prone individuals were rated as more capable leaders than less guilt-prone individuals and that a sense of responsibility for others underlies the positive relationship between guilt proneness and leadership evaluations.
我们提出,内疚倾向是领导者的一个关键特征,并在三项研究中找到了支持这一假设的证据。第一项研究的参与者将一系列容易内疚的行为评为更能体现领导潜力,而不是一系列不易内疚的行为。在后续的一项无领导任务研究中,易内疚的参与者比不易内疚的参与者表现出更多的领导行为。在第三项也是最后一项研究中,我们将研究领域转移到了一组在不同行业工作的年轻经理的 360°反馈中。结果表明,高度内疚倾向的个体被评为更有能力的领导者,而不是内疚倾向较低的个体,对他人的责任感是内疚倾向与领导评价之间正相关的基础。