Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice.
School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):181-192. doi: 10.1037/a0028387. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
There is a large body of accumulated evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging studies regarding how and where in the brain we represent basic numerical information. A number of these studies have considered how numerical representations may differ between individuals according to their age or level of mathematical ability, but one issue rarely considered is whether the representational acuity or automaticity of using numerical representations differs between the sexes. We report 4 studies that suggest that male participants show a stronger influence of the spatial representation of number as revealed through the spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect, through the numerical distance effect (NDE), and through number-line estimations. Evidence for a sex difference in processing number was present for parity decisions (Experiment 1), color decisions (Experiment 2), number-line estimations (Experiment 3), and magnitude decisions (Experiment 4). We argue that this pattern of results reflects a sex difference in either the acuity of representation or reliance upon spatial representations of number, and that this difference may arise due to differences in the parietal lobes of men and women.
有大量的行为和神经影像学研究证据表明,我们在大脑中何处以及如何表示基本的数字信息。这些研究中的许多研究都考虑了根据个体的年龄或数学能力,数字表示可能会有所不同,但很少考虑的一个问题是,在使用数字表示时,代表的敏锐度或自动性是否存在性别差异。我们报告了 4 项研究,这些研究表明,男性参与者在通过空间数字关联反应代码(SNARC)效应、数字距离效应(NDE)和数字线估计中表现出更强的数字空间表示的影响。在奇偶决策(实验 1)、颜色决策(实验 2)、数字线估计(实验 3)和大小决策(实验 4)中都存在性别差异的证据。我们认为,这种结果模式反映了性别在数字表示的敏锐度或对数字空间表示的依赖方面的差异,这种差异可能是由于男性和女性顶叶的差异造成的。